Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Prescriptions per person double

  • 2 Comments

The number of prescriptions dispensed in the last two decades had doubled from eight a year to 16 despite most people living longer and healthier lives, a study has shown

The research paper, published in the Social Science & Medicine journal, accused pharmaceutical companies of “disease mongering”, arguing they massaged statistics and defined an increasing number of conditions, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and high cholesterol, as diseases purely for the pursuit of profit.

Study author Professor Joan Busfield, of Essex University, said: “I think drugs are being overused. The population is getting healthier and healthier, longevity is increasing, but we are using more and more drugs.”

The professor also attacked the intensive marketing practices of drug companies, claiming that while doctors said their prescription choices were not influenced by the industry, research showed otherwise.

“The evidence indicates it is and that even small gifts can influence behaviour,” she said.

  • 2 Comments

Readers' comments (2)

  • Could people be living longer because of the drugs they are being prescribed?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's unclear from this summary whether they're counting prescriptions, or prescribed meds - it sounds like prescriptions. Locally in Scotland, there has been a push to restricting prescriptions to a 4-week supply to reduce wastage (& also standardises cost to patients, but moving towards free prescriptions so won't be relevant in the future). So whereas I was previously dispensed medication 2-monthly for a chronic condition, it is now monthly - twice as many annual prescriptions despite no change in meds. Does this study take account of such changes in prescribing practice?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs