Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

Using general nurses to fill health visitor gaps puts children at risk

Comment

I agree that only HVs should be visiting and caring for vulnerable families. I also agree that extra training is required and I am currently on the PGdip. However, from a personal perspective I know numerous children who were not picked up by their health visitor as having developmental delays and yet it was obvious to me as a childcare provider delivering the EYFS and it was myself and colleagues who alerted the health visitor to these concerns. I feel the problem lies not with using nursery nurses, who are extremely aware of developmental issues, but more with the abolishment of the 3.5yr developmental review. Unfortunately it is many of the most vulnerable children who do not access early years provision and therefore are missed. The other issue is the lack of suitable practice teachers due to the suspension in training for so long. Many PCTs and educational establishments have funding and spaces on courses but nobody to oversee practice.

Posted date

5 February, 2010

Posted time

11:15 pm

required
required
required
required