Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

'Take a stand against violent behaviour in A&E'

Comment

michael stone | 23-Nov-2011 11:03 am If only it were that simple. The 'public' do not consist of 'like-minded' people who all want the same things from clinicians. Probably difficult for you to understand, but there are often reasons why people don't ask questions. People often know instinctively and don't need someone spelling it out to them. Some people genuinely don't want to know. I saw a doctor receive a punch in the face after imparting the reality of a patient's condition. His crime? According to the patient, it was because the doctor had taken away his hope. It isn't about clinicians not admitting that people are dying. It is nowhere near as simple as that. As for the radio interview quoted, that is only one side of the story. Without knowing the full circumstances of all the interactions, it is just too easy and unfair to blame the clinicians, who have no right of reply. Meanwhile back to the actual article, I agree that a re-design of A&E to protect staff and patients can't be a bad thing. However, it must be coupled with nurses ceasing to tolerate incidents and, most importantly, severe consequences for those who perpetrate these crimes.

Posted date

23 November, 2011

Posted time

5:41 pm

required
required
required
required