Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

Francis calls for rethink on minimum nurse staffing

Comment

Mr Francis stated: “It’s evidence… [that] ought to be considered with regard to whether there is some sort of benchmark, which at least is a bit like a mortality rates – an alarm bell which should require at least questions to be asked about whether it is possible for a service to be safe.” He stressed the level should not be viewed as “the adequate level of staffing, but the level below which you cannot be safe”. I've pointed out before that Francis is very clever - he knows the dangers of setting staffing ratios (that minimums will be seen as maximums, and that trusts will also claim 'we met the ratios, so we MUST 'have had enough staff''). I doubt that his position has changed - I suspect he is trying to protect patients against the setting of minimum ratios which will then be abused by Trusts ?

Posted date

6 August, 2013

Posted time

10:21 am

required
required
required
required