Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Plans mean Surrey could lose some of its community hospital sites

  • Comment

A review of community bed capacity by Surrey Downs Clinical Commissioning Group has set out four options for future care models, which include the closure of two cottage hospitals.

The five community hospital sites under review by commissioners in Surrey are at Leatherhead, Dorking, Cobham, Molesey, and New Epsom and Ewell.

Three of the hospitals currently have inpatient beds. Leatherhead’s inpatient beds were closed in November.

A review team found the inpatient care delivered at the three hospitals was “exceptionally good”, according to a report in the CCG’s September board papers. All five sites provide outpatient services.

The options set out by the CCG in its draft outcome report are:

  1. Keep inpatient wards at Dorking, Molesey, and New Epsom and Ewell community hospitals. Keep Leatherhead Community Hospital’s inpatient ward closed and develop its planned care services.
  2. Transfer New Epsom and Ewell inpatient services to Epsom and transfer outpatient services elsewhere in the area. Develop Leatherhead’s planned care services.
  3. Transfer Molesey inpatient and outpatient services to Cobham Community Hospital. Develop Leatherhead’s planned care services.
  4. Apply both options two and three, resulting in the closure of two hospitals.

The report said demand for inpatient and outpatient services at the hospitals was expected to increase over the next few years.

Surrey Downs’ over-65s account for 20% of the total population. This is expected to increase to 27% by 2025.

The report said it was “widely acknowledged” by the CCG and “wider health community” that the current community bed provision had “some issues which are in need of urgent consideration and review”.

These include a “lack of consistency in the admissions criteria”, “variable” discharge support arrangements between social care and community services, and hospital estates of “varied quality, with at least one of the sites in need of urgent repairs”.

“We have looked at the data, analysed local health needs and the changing needs of our ageing population, considered best practice and talked to patients and staff”

Jill Evans

The review included drop-in events with staff at CSH Surrey, the social enterprise that runs four of the hospitals. Cobham is run by private provider Epsomedical.

The commissioners will also consult on whether to increase the number of rehabilitation beds at New Epsom and Ewell or develop an ambulatory rehabilitation centre model.

Under all options there would be 60 beds, although six of these will only be commissioned if extra capacity is needed.

Several options were discounted including inpatient wards at all four hospitals and closing Leatherhead and Dorking hospitals.

Jill Evans, clinical lead for the review, said: “Over the last four months we have looked at the data, analysed local health needs and the changing needs of our ageing population, considered best practice and talked to patients and staff.

“We have also looked at the current buildings, both in terms of their condition and any unused capacity that could enable services to be delivered in a different way,” she said.

“This has led to a series of recommendations that we believe will improve care, mainly by making the delivery of care even more efficient and streamlined for patients,” she added.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.