Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Major review of midwife regulation recommends removal of statutory supervision

  • 4 Comments

Midwives should no longer be investigated by supervisors, according to a recommendation from a major independent review looking at how to improve regulation of midwifery.

The review, which follows the maternity care failings at Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, said this “additional tier of regulation” by local supervising authorities – for which there is no equivalent in nursing – was not justified.

Instead, the Nursing and Midwifery Council - which currently oversees the work of LSAs and takes fitness to practice referrals from them – should have “direct responsibility” for regulating midwives, said the King’s Fund, which led the review.

“The additional layer of regulation…for midwives and the extended role for the NMC over statutory supervision should end”

The King’s Fund

The change in the law this would require means the statutory requirement for midwives to have a supervisor would be removed.

The report noted that most midwifery stakeholders were concerned that this law change would result in supervisors being eliminated altogether, which would remove an important source of support for them.

The Royal College of Midwives said that if the NMC were to accept the King’s Fund recommendations, this would wipe out “an important aspect of pubic protection”.

RCM chief executive Cathy Warwick told Nursing Times: “The idea behind the supportive element of the system is that [supervisors] identify practitioners who may be feeling that they lack competence at an early stage and then do something to rectify that before it gets to the point of harming someone.”

While recognising the supportive role that supervisors play for midwives, the King’s Fund said that this should not come under the NMC’s remit and that in the future “others in the health care system should take on responsibility for ensuring these functions continue”.

“[Supervisors] identify practitioners who may be feeling they lack competence at an early stage and do something to rectify that before it gets to the point of harming someone”

Cathy Warwick

But the RCM said it was “very worried” that no other body would be willing to take on this job.

The King’s Fund review was commissioned by the NMC following investigations by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman in England’s into failures in maternity care at Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust.

The PHSO also recommended that the NMC should be in direct control of regulatory activity, and that midwifery supervision and regulation should be separate – because it led to a conflict of interest between midwives and supervisors.

In its review, the King’s Fund found that the extra tier of regulation for midwives did not appear to stop unnecessary referrals being made to the NMC or delay necessary referrals.

It also found that there was no evidence to suggest either way whether the risks associated with midwifery meant the additional layer of regulation was required, but said it was clear that it did cause confusion for patients and the public about where responsibility lay.

It concluded: “The NMC as the health care professional regulator should have direct responsibility and accountability solely for the core functions of regulation.

“The legislation pertaining to the NMC should be revised to reflect this. This means that the additional layer of regulation currently in place for midwives and the extended role for the NMC over statutory supervision should end.”

The NMC Council meets on 28 January to decide whether to accept the recommendations made in the King’s Fund review.

  • 4 Comments

Readers' comments (4)

  • A sad day for women and babies and their safety and choice in maternity services. Statutory supervision has supported the delivery and development of high standard maternity services since 1902_ to remove it is a real risk to maternity services

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ... and a sad day for any nurse who does value or who would appreciate the opportunity to take part in reflective practice or clinical supervision.

    "The NMC ... should have direct responsibility and accountability solely for the core functions of regulation".

    Blimey! The NMC have done a great job so far so let's give them even more power! (sarcasm alert). I despair.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Let me get this straight; the senior, experienced midwives will cease to take on the role of 'Supervisor of Midwives' but the NMC will? What a good idea, we all know what good value the NMC is, how proficient they are in all they do, and how they watch every penny of our money that they spend. Give them an extra function and they will be able to plead poverty again. They do not have to worry about it they can just put up the registration fee as usual and we can all happily pay up. (Major sarcasm alert)!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Then they can no longer pay them at a higher banding scale for the magnificent job they do! Well done NMC!!
    We'll bend over and let you shaft us all once again!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.