Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Forum calls for review of 'unacceptable' CPD variation

  • 4 Comments

Current provision of post-registration training for nurses is “unacceptable” and must be the subject of a national review, the government’s Future Forum has recommended.

The forum, which comprises about 40 representatives from healthcare professions, was tasked with drawing up a series of recommendations to improve the Health Bill, following widespread criticism that the concerns of clinicians about the legislation had not been adequately addressed.

Today it published a series of reports detailing 16 recommendations on amendments to the bill.

In its report on clinical advice and leadership, the forum said it had been told the NHS “has not taken continuing professional development (CPD) for its staff seriously”, despite a commitment to it in the NHS Constitution.

There was “huge variation” in support for CPD within and between organisations, and across the NHS as a whole, the report said.

It stated: “Supporting the development of staff in the NHS is essential if the service is to continually improve and meet new challenges. The variation in the current provision of continuing professional development (CPD) for NHS staff is unacceptable.”

While acknowledging that issues, such as funding and staffing cover, could make the provision of CPD complex, the report said it should be “prioritised and accessible” to all staff.

It stated: “We recommend that the National Quality Board reviews the provision of CPD across the NHS.”

A second forum report, looking specifically at education and training, added: “CPD needs to be regarded seriously, adequately resourced and prioritised and should be linked to staff appraisals.

“We heard of examples of where CPD was undertaken comprehensively but we also heard from staff who had received no professional development since qualifying.”

The government is due to publish its initial response to forum’s report tomorrow, which will set out an agreement between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats on future health policy.

A more detailed response is expected to be published next Monday.

  • 4 Comments

Readers' comments (4)

  • Hurray, at last someone is taking CPD seriously, but let's not hold our breath just yet!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • should be standardised, nationalised, adapted to area of work, and equally accessible to all. or is this too simplistic?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Absolutely agree with Anonymous | 14-Jun-2011 12:39 pm. The current provision is absolutely pathetic, if you get it at all. It should not be down to pot luck whether you get post qualification training or not.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There are rumours abound that the NMC will actually be calling everyone within the next three years and ask the Trusts Professional Development Departments to validate to confirm evidence of CPD.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs