Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Nurse training policy should 'consider part-funding of CPD by NMC'


The Nursing and Midwifery Council should be considered as a potential source for funding the training of qualified nurses in the future, rather than relying “exclusively” on employers to pay for ongoing learning, according to a research body.

The National Nursing Research Unit at King’s College London said the “responsibility and funding for post-qualification education need not lie exclusively with employers, but shared between all relevant parties” such as the NMC, the Department of Health and workforce planning body Health Education England.

”Responsibility and funding for post-qualification education need not lie exclusively with employers”

NNRU report

In its report looking at post-graduate education and career pathways in nursing – which contributed to last month’s major review of pre and post registration training for nurses, the Shape of Caring – the NNRU pointed to research which showed lack of funding as being one of the most common reasons why nurses did not attend training courses.

Currently the NMC provides no funding for any form of ongoing nurse training or education.

However, the regulator does require all nurses to complete a minimum amount of ongoing training – referred to as continuing professional development – to remain on the NMC register.

The NMC states employers have a responsibility to support staff to take part in ongoing learning activities, which “may mean ensuring that any funding required to support attendance at learning activities is protected”.

“There needs to be investment in CPD that reflects the diverse needs of the nursing workforce”

NNRU report

It is usually down to both employers and nurses to negotiate how much of the worker’s CPD will be paid for by them.

From December, the minimum amount of CPD that nurses must complete every three years will rise from 35 to 40 hours, due to the regulator’s introduction of a new system checking nurse competencies – called revalidation.

The NNRU report, co-authored by Anne Marie Rafferty, Andreas Xyrichis and Chris Caldwell, also said that continuing professional development should in the future be “clearly linked” to nurse career development rather than being viewed as a way of maintaining standards.

Writing for just 20 minutes per day will help you retain the skills you learn

Meanwhile, “scaling and speeding up” the production of advanced and specialist nurses should also be considered to deal with the increasing demand in primary and community care, according to the NNRU.

The report concluded: “There needs to be investment in CPD that reflects the diverse needs of the nursing workforce and the changing profile of the current and future patient as much as workforce.

“This needs to be linked with nurses’ career pathways, enabling them to make the transition from newly registered to advanced practice nurse across different domains appear seamless.”


Readers' comments (5)

  • I work as a Primary Care Nurse in a GP practice in Australia. I have to pay for all of my own CPD every year - minimum of 20hrs of relevant to practice development. Thank goodness for NT learning as I live in a regional area and there are very few courses on offer for practice nurses. If I could attend it would have to be in my own time which only gives me weekends and cost between $350 & $800 per 1/2 day or day course. Totally unaffordable when none of the staff have had a pay rise for 5yrs. If your employer offers training, grab it!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • the NMC have to contribute to CPD? Thats the registration up again.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree with Alex. For every pound that NMC pays out in CPD they would have to raise 10-20% more in revenue from nurses to include the administration costs of running the scheme. So nurses would end up paying even more for the same amount of CPD. Who came up with is bright idea?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The NMc have enough to do in their regulation role. Life long lerarning and the development of learning cultures is both an individual and organisational responsibility

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • When the UKCC came into being (pre NMC) there were 4 National Boards. The latter were responsible for Nurse Education, to provide or approve courses. I undertook several of these courses and never paid a penny. These were abolished as the NMC became into being. See for a brief history. What I am saying is it is nothing new.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.