Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Osborne has pledged more money for the NHS, but at what cost?

  • 11 Comments

George Osborne has said he will give an extra £3.8bn to the NHS in England next year. Ministers have previously pledged an additional £8bn for the health service over the next five years, so the news today is basically that the NHS will be getting a large slab of that money earlier than the rest, in what is termed frontloading.

So what should we make of it? As is often the case with such announcements, there is an element of smoke and mirrors about it, which should set a few alarm bells ringing. The government has unveiled the good news – more money for the health service – but expect the devil in the detail tomorrow and during the coming months.

Basically, to help pay for the extra money for the NHS, cuts are widely expected to the budgets for public health and education, which are apparently no longer deemed to be within the “ringfence” of protected NHS spending.

This will almost certainly see an end to free nurse education for nursing students, with the current bursary system replaced by loans. A highly controversial move, even within the profession itself.

It also means local authorities will be under pressure to find more savings on top of the 6.2% in-year cut they are already having to shave off public health budgets in 2015-16. Almost certainly bad news for health visitors, school nurses and all other specialist public health nursing staff!

So, let’s deal with public health first. Has the dream already turned sour since the much lauded transfer of public health commissioning from the NHS back to councils? While seen as its traditional home, the move to local authority control has seen it suddenly vulnerable to cuts.

Admittedly, there may be some innovative service design forced through as a result, for example the merging of currently separate nursing services for 0-5s and 5-16s, which may not necessarily be a bad thing. But, as ever, staffing numbers could take a hit – including the hard-won gains to health visiting workforce – and lots of other local initiatives and schemes could be axed.

I’ve listened to doyens of the sector like Sir Michael Marmot eloquently and forcefully explaining how long-term investment in public health and prevention is really the key to reducing the ever increasing pressure on the NHS. Their evidence is compelling and their calls for public health funding to be on a much longer cycle than the four-year parliamentary merry-go-round are unshakably logical, as far as I’m concerned.

However, once again, it seems that funding streams for preventing ill-health will be cut at the expense of those for treating the resulting conditions. Is it simply that public health as a collective term is seen as less “sexy” with the electorate and headline writers than the NHS – possibly!

Cuts to budgets for public health are short-sighted whatever the reason. Reducing the number of contacts with NHS services by improving the overall health of populations is surely a better answer than building more and more hospitals, especially when we are struggling to staff them.

And so to the question of future funding for nurse education. If reports are correct, tomorrow could see the beginning of the end for the student nurse bursary. Unsurprisingly this is an idea that brings out strong opinions.

I remember having a blazing row with a friend over the then government’s policy to do-away with student grants in the middle of the 1990s. It was something I felt really passionate about, having been the first in my family to have the opportunity to go to university.

Likewise, current students will be nervous about how they will pay their way in the remaining years of their course and unions have warned it will put off potential recruits – some nurses on social media site Twitter have already been reflecting on whether they would have entered the profession without a bursary.

But on the other hand, some argue that the bursary does not really provide enough money to live on and that a loan would mean students were better off in the short-term, though obviously saddled with repayments later. It would also bring nursing and midwifery into line with other professions, where student grants have long been a thing of the past.

There are several factors to consider here. Does putting nursing on a level playing field with other university courses make it less appealing to potential students? Nursing is often viewed as a vocation, so many may continue on their chosen career path, regardless of bursaries or loans.

Equally, perhaps moving to a loan might weed out students who have chosen nursing simply because it does come with a bursary and are not really best-suited to the profession – sorry, a controversial point, I know.

But it could also be argued that a loan is more of a problem for a nursing graduate than many other professions, simply on the grounds of the future pay levels they can expect compared to other graduates. In addition, there is a perception – rightly or wrongly – that many of those choosing nursing come from less well-off families than, say, doctors, architects or lawyers. This may disappear, as nursing becomes increasingly established as a graduate profession with ever more specialist and expert skills, but there have been warnings that, at present, loans could represent a financial barrier to some.

And what of student doctors and dentists. There has been no suggestion, as yet, that they will lose their bursaries, despite the fact graduates in these subjects can look forward to commanding much, much greater salaries than even the best-paid nurses. Does the government think it already has enough of a fight on its hands with the British Medical Association over junior doctors’ pay?

It should be noted that one of the key drivers behind the change were the universities themselves, who have lobbied ministers on the idea and, in turn, been quizzed by the Treasury on how it might work.

As reported by Nursing Times, they have championed a move to loans because it will give them the flexibility to open more places on nursing and midwifery courses if they wish, rather than being constrained by the number of bursaries available from Health Education England. It means they can make more money, basically, but it could potentially break the boom and bust cycle of workforce supply that seems to dog nursing in the NHS.

A final point to end on. While clinical commissioning groups and their provider organisations will no doubt be very pleased today with the promised extra £3.8bn in the pot for next year, there are likely to be caveats on how they spend the cash injection.

Runaway trust deficits and winter pressures aside, NHS England will want some of the money to be used to pump-prime the new models of care outlined in its Five-Year Forward View and the government will almost certainly be setting targets for introducing its promised seven-day service.

We await the detail and its devils within from the chancellor tomorrow.

  • 11 Comments

Readers' comments (11)

  • Excellent commentary!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree with a lot of what you say, but I have a feeling that moving towards tuition fees will cause a decrease in applicants. The problem isn't so much that the bursary is difficult to live on (which it is), but that a lot of people who enter nursing will have had professional jobs where they earned a lot more money and going on then to live like a student is a big financial step down especially when your family situation doesn't get any less expensive. And many people have also considered the bursary as payment for having to do clinical hours in placement, I know this is a period where you are supposed to be learning but everyone knows students are used as HCA's 90% of the time on wards that are under staffed. And it will be near impossible for people who have previous degrees to get into nursing

    It would be a very poor decision to move towards ending bursaries. They were initially introduced to encourage more people to go into nursing, and we are not going to be earning as much as our healthcare peers to be able to afford to pay back such large loans. I'm happy I've already started the course as I definitely couldn't have afford to be in debt at my age.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Two friends embarking on the first step in a career. One starts a nursing degree and the other doesn't. The nursing student has a loan and then not only studies and submits essays on time, but also works long hours on the wards, often during unsocial hours. These are not paid because the student is 'learning' but make no mistake they are working hard. The other also has a loan but manages a full and often never to be forgotten social life whilst studying. They both complete their courses, the nursing student begins a life of continual study, long working hours, mediocre pay at least initially, enormous responsibility and a loan debt to pay off. The other may well undertake some further study, but no one is going to die if they make a mistake. They are likely to be paid more initially, pay off their loan earlier and be at home on Christmas day. They do not have to be pleasant to people they would not choose to talk to in the normal course of life because they are so disagreeable and rude, and are not pilloried every day in the local or national newspapers without the ability to respond. Would I choose a career in nursing again today knowing what I do ?. I really don't think I would.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is a short sighted view to take away the bursary, as a first year mature student nurse I, along with others, would not have embarked on nursing if we would be accruing massive debts. I am sure many will not apply or simply leave the course if they have to pay for it. Also were do the universities teach these extra nurses or find mentors and placements. Our university is openly struggling with the numbers in our cohort to find rooms, mentors and placements.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Does this mean we will have to pay for post grad training we are expected yes expected to do for the rest of our lives? Pay to become a nurse, pay to be a nurse and pay to keep up with the nmc's increasing educational demands. In the meantime cut enhancements. All for what, to be given 2 fingers by the government for a cost of living rise. Why are we and future generations of nurses suffering for politicians incompetence? Let's not forget they are the ones who bankrupted the UK and they seem fine with giving themselves massive pay rises, I bet their expenses are a right hoot to read. No fear though, for those that cant move from this country lidl and Aldi pay fantastic wages.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm on my acess course now and was hoping to go into nursing. Now I hear the only way I'd be able to afford to do so is going out the window? This country is supposed to be helping future nurses and the NHS but at this rate less British students will be going for nursing and the NHS will still end up paying for angecy or nurses from abroard in a longer term basis. Shouldn't the government be doing everything it can to utilise and encourage the people already here and in the long run save itself money? They're quick enough to give themselves massive wages but they'd never be able to live off of my wage, pay for studying, childcare and bills and such. They need to wake up. The NHS need to start charging for those that are wasting time and resources i.e. bing drinkers and such and invest in those who want to put their future in the NHS.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    What you write here, is a possibility:

    'Does the government think it already has enough of a fight on its hands with the British Medical Association over junior doctors’ pay?'

    It is also a possibility, that the goverment is more willing to 'pick a fight' with the nursing profession, than with the medical profession, in general.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm applying to study mental health nursing in Sep'16 and hearing the above news that the bursary could be scrapped is concerning.
    Student finance is tricky enough to get your head round as it is, without being put in a limbo situation, whereby i'm not now sure (when i do apply for finance in/after January) what money i am/am not entitled to apply for.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Im so disapointed this went through, I love doing nursing but there are few financial benefits in becoming a nurse and this was one of them. I have friends who had previously done other degrees part way through who will now have so much debt over their heads. We work so hard for the NHS the three years we are training and now not only will it be for free but we will be paying them back for doing so.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Michelle

    It'll be a shame if the bursary is scrapped. It helped me a lot when I was doing my training and it was a relief knowing I did not have to pay it back. I completed the degree part of the programme in my final year and 3 years after graduating I'm still paying off my student loan.

    Nursing as a profession just seems very easy for politicians to pick on.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 1020results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs