Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Admitting fault may allow nurses to avoid NMC hearing


Nurses facing fitness to practise proceedings can now avoid a full hearing if they admit they are at fault, following the introduction of two new measures by the Nursing and Midwifery Council.

Under one of the changes to the system, which came into force today, a nurse can admit that their fitness to practise is impaired and accept a sanction, such as suspension, proposed by the NMC. 

Allegations will have to be admitted in full and details of cases dealt with under the process will be recorded and published in the same way as all other NMC panel determinations.

The regulator believes the move will bring significant benefits, including avoiding unnecessary full hearings and resolving cases quicker – and therefore helping it reduce its historical backlog of cases.

The process is called “consensual panel determination” by the NMC, although it is known in legal circles as “consensual disposal”. It is already used by the General Medical Council.  

The decision to introduce it was agreed by the NMC council in November and was supported by 80% of respondents to a formal consultation held between May and August 2012.

Serious allegations will still have to be dealt with through an NMC public hearing.

Jackie Smith, NMC chief executive and registrar, said the new process would allow the regulator to “fairly and swiftly” manage cases where a nurse or midwife accepted the charges against them.

“This process will encourage nurses and midwives whose fitness to practise is impaired to acknowledge this at an early stage,” she said. “This will reduce the need for witnesses to attend hearings and reduce the length of hearings, enabling us to concentrate our resources on cases where there are significant matters in dispute.

“Consensual panel determination will help us to reduce the overall time it takes to progress a case, enabling us to meet one of our most important objectives of hearing fitness to practise cases in a fair and timely manner,” she added.

The NMC has also introduced a second mechanism for nurses and midwives subject to fitness to practise proceedings that allows them to voluntarily remove their names from the register.

Under the change, a nurse or midwife who admits their fitness to practise is impaired and who does not intend to continue practicing can apply to be permanently removed from the register without a full public hearing.

The NMC has decided voluntary removal will only be allowed in circumstances where there is no public interest in holding a full hearing and where patients are best protected by a clinician’s immediate removal from the register. 

It is likely to be available to those who accept they are no longer fit to practise due to a serious or long-term health condition or are near retirement age. If an application is allowed, the status “voluntarily removed” will appear next to the name of the nurse or midwife in the online version of the NMC register.

Ms Smith added: “Voluntary removal ensures that we can take swift action to safeguard patients and the public and will allow fitness to practise cases to progress more efficiently and cost-effectively.”

Peter Carter, chief executive and general secretary of the Royal College of Nursing, said: “Voluntary removal in addition to the introduction of consensual panel determinations will provide more flexibility and allow the NMC to give greater attention to their most serious cases.

“The NMC needs to be as efficient as possible if it is to justify increased registration fees,” he said. “We hope these changes will allow certain cases, where there is no public interest in a full tribunal, to be resolved more quickly.”


Readers' comments (36)

  • is this just to save money? why can't nurses just resign? what has nearing retirement age got to do with it?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Another money-saver from the NMC.
    When will they start to actually support our profession?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • won't this push some innocent nurses into admitting guilt against false allegations just to avoid further difficulties?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What do the unions/occy health/lawyers have to say about nurses nearing retirement age or having long-term health conditions being asked to accept they are no longer fit to practice. This is very worrying indeed. Is this just a form of constructive dismissal, what rights will they have? Will they still be entitled to all their pension? what about their reputation and recognition for their years of service?

    Many older nurses and those with long-term health conditions are very competent, caring, energetic and safe.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Different treatment by process if you are approaching retirement age sounds like an ageist policy and therefore potentially in breach of the 2010 Equality Act.

    NMC heading for a procedural nightmare? Surely not?

    It would be interesting to see how many practitioners would actually fall on their sword (that is what they are effectively doing) if there is a reasonable chance that they would actually not receive a sanction. Sounds like people will be gambling on the outcome of an investigation and panel deliberations. We have professionals on these panels for a reason - its about mitigation and reviewing the human factor where things go awry. This sounds like a tool where people can volunteer to commit registration suicide to reduce the amount of work undertaken by the NMC rather than what suits the Registrant regardless of guilt or innocence.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • George Kuchanny

    The important part of this article is “This process will encourage nurses and midwives whose fitness to practise is impaired to acknowledge this at an early stage,” - From my perspective this is a very good thing. Those of us who deny error having made one should be dealt with more harshly than those who admit and learn. Full stop. I agree with other comments where someone who is completely free of error might admit to one. Please please do not. As for the so called ageist component, I do not think that it is frankly. Retirement on ill health grounds is available to those of us who think our competence is impaired by advancing personal health issues (by the way I am very long in the tooth myself!). The real issue here is those who are incompetent and WILL NOT admit it even though they are putting people at risk.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I can't get my head around this.

    Are they saying that, for instance, a nurse makes a drug error - she is coming up to retirement age so the NMC will push her into believing she is too old, therefore obviously past her best and therefore incompetent? She is then forced to voluntarily remove her name off the register which would obviously then lead to her being forced to retire/resign.

    If a younger nurse makes the same error they will be subject to a full enquiry with all the legal and union support we all deserve - regardless of age.

    Nurses are expected to work until they are 65, which is not our choice, are we all to be discriminated against now as well and being made to feel useless.

    Isn't this just a case of 'go before we push you out'.

    Who were the 80% of respondents? How many of them were nurses with long term health conditions or coming up to retirement age?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If a nurse makes an error then they need support, it doesn't matter what age you are. It is against the law to discriminate on the grounds of age. Nurses are expected to work until they are 65, if the NMC or anyone else doesn't believe that is safe then lower the age or place us in positions where our skills would be appreciated such as in the role of 'care maker'.
    I would like to know who these 80% of respondents were?
    Older nurses have a wealth of experience and knowledge, if they make an error then they should be treated the same way as a younger nurse, anything other is clear discrimination and is very patronising.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 14-Jan-2013 1:35 pm

    excellent comment.

    I would like to know what the NMC, an employer, a manager, a nurse consider an error. What human being does not make errors? Everybody during the course of their career will commit errors and more so if they are working under pressure.

    there is a difference between an intentional error, an accidental error and an error due to negligence. where are the fine dividing lines?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • furthermore, if one commits an error which will affect the patient one reports it to the team, reports it to the treating physician and records it in the patient's notes. normally the course of action to take is decided with the doctor and unless it is detrimental to the patient and serious should not need to go any further. What is the issue with this?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.