Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Andrew Lansley orders NMC to look again at proposed fee rise


Health secretary Andrew Lansley has ordered the Nursing and Midwifery Council to “explore all possible options to avoid” the proposed 58% fee increase and commission an independent audit of the proposals.

The NMC claims it needs to increase the annual registrants fee from £76 a year to £120 a year to raise the funds to get on top of its backlog of fitness to practise cases and cope with rising referrals.

However, in its highly critical review of the nursing regulator, the Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence questioned the assumptions on which the need for the proposed increase was based and criticised the NMC for failing to accurately cost activity. The proposal has been met with near universal opposition from nurses and midwives.

A spokeswoman for the Department of Health said: “At a time of pay restraint it is only right that the Nursing and Midwifery Council explore all possible options to avoid an increase.

“They should be able to justify to their registrants the need for a rise, which is why we have asked them to carry out an independent assessment of their proposals.”

The news was welcomed by the Royal College of Nursing, the Royal College of Midwives and Unison.

In a joint statement they said: “We are pleased that the Secretary of State agrees with us that it is difficult to justify a fee increase for registrants, and has intervened in this way. As the unions representing nurses and midwives we welcome the request from the government for the NMC to commission an independent audit of its case for a fee rise.

“We hope to see the terms of reference for the audit as soon as possible, and that those terms will be wide-ranging enough to deliver the change which is needed if the NMC is to be financially sustainable.”

The union statement also called for the 24 August deadline on the NMC’s consultation on the fee rise to be extended to take account of the findings of the audit.

The NMC was due to make a decision on the fee rise at its meeting in September in order that the increase would be introduced from January 2013.

However, the health secretary’s intervention makes it unlikely the regulator will be able to stick to its original timetable anyway.

Nursing Times understands the new chair Mark Addison, who joins in September, is also keen to assure himself that the proposed fee rise is necessary.

The union statement continued: “The NMC is presenting our members with a fee rise of nearly 60%. This is not a situation which the nursing and midwifery professions can tolerate.

“The proposed audit needs to be carried out swiftly and its recommendations taken on board. This is essential for nurses and midwives to have confidence in the NMC as their regulator. It is also key to the organisation moving forward, demonstrating value for money and ensuring its statutory responsibility to protect patients.”  


Readers' comments (32)

  • Why don't they reloacte to a cheaper area and free up soke of ther real estate they own..

    Lisa Ward
    Lead Respiratory Nurse
    Southend University hospital

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    Is AL trying to court popularity with nurses, now ?

    Strikes me as a bit late to attempt that.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree with a change of location as stated by Lisa Ward - if the BBC can do it then why not the NMC?!

    The proposal of such a huge rise for the NMC fee is nothing short of disgusting and cannot be justified on any level. The organisation must look elswhere for their cost reduction. Perhaps within the department would be a good start. All organisations have had to produce savings from within, remove waste, headcount reduction, reviews of capital and estates, so please do the same. The poor managment of the NMC needs to be addressed and the burden of it's incompetence not be passed on to the nurses and midwives who have already taken a pay cut/freeze.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NMC claims rent on current property is minimal,left to them by Miss Nightingale ect.I remember they had an American in charge at one time, on a huge wage,dont recall many great changes.Looking at the list of despots awaiting a striking off order,what a performance getting rid of them,those that are guilty, should pay a huge fine and monies relocated back to the'hearings committee'Why should honest hard working nurses have to pay for the vile dishonest ones?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • anne murphy spence, that is a despicable stance to take. Not everyone awaiting trial by the witch hunters at the NMC is vile, dishonest or even guilty!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • tinkerbell

    DH Agent - as if ! | 6-Aug-2012 2:06 pm

    Only so he will have some left to employ in the private sector when it all kicks off big time.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • further to 5.33pm

    in answer to anne murphy spence

    ... and it can happen to anybody at any time, even you, and I am sure you would not call yourself vile and dishonest ? !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well, if the NMC do put the fees up, the first thing I'll do is cancel my RCN membership to offset that increase and I'd encourage everyone to do the same: hit the RCN and Unison in the pocket.

    Carters lot need to get a grip and fight this all the way.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • i believe the NHS has been told to make savings! this has seen buildings being rationalised, team members being rationalised activities monitored to get value for money- wages frozen

    so why cant the NMC do this before demanding money from members- any other business would not raise their fees by 60%- they would lose the custom and collapse- but hey we nurses are stuffed we can refuse- or we cant work- they got us hook line and sinker.

    its not RCN and Unison that make this decision they are trying everything to get a solution-- its the NMC we need to hit and yes is nurses were managed locally, many would not be going to the NMC- so those that do nd there should be fined or charged towards the costs just as they would in a court-

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The NMC(and its predecessors) has experienced many problems. Dwelling on the problems serves no purpose but seeking a solution is a priority.

    Take a look here

    In New Zealand all FtP cases involving Health Care Practitioners (including Doctors) are managed by the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal.

    Complaints which allege a Nurse is unfit to practise but where the complaint does NOT involve patients) may be dealt with by the Nursing Council of New Zealand,25,html/Home

    The system seems to function well, with minimum delays when compared to the UK and ensures a level of consistency in decision making not always seen in the UK

    New Zealand registered Health Care Practitioners found unfit to practise are liable for hearing costs and they may also be subject to a financial penalty (fine). Details of cases involving Nurses can be read here.

    An actual decision can be read here NOTE the tribunal costs of NZ$10,000 made against the defendant!

    Maybe we should pursue a similar system ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.