Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Capital trusts need urgent change

  • 2 Comments

A new report has highlighted that four out of the five most financially challenged hospital trusts in England are in London, and the capital’s NHS faces growing pressure with services in need of urgent change.

The report, published this week by The King’s Fund, claims that the majority of hospitals in London are struggling to meet new standards for the quality of care. It also warns that without major changes to reorganise hospital services, improve primary care and move more services into the community, London’s NHS may not be able to guarantee consistently high standards of patient care, and furthermore, could become financially unsustainable.

Structures put in place under the government’s health reforms are unlikely to deliver the change that is urgently required, the report argues. It claims that the capital’s health system is confusing and incoherent, because there are a large number of organisations whose remits are not always clear, and there is no single body responsible for leading change. All this adds to the risk that change will be delayed.

Something that will add further delays, almost to the point of changes being rejected, is the new requirement for competition regulators to scrutinise proposed changes. As the need for change is urgent, the report calls for current rules on NHS mergers and competition in the capital to be revised or suspended.

Proposals put forward in the report are for NHS England’s London office to take on a city-wide planning role. This could work with clinical commissioning groups. Hospitals should be given a mandate to implement service change via working together in large-scale networks.The suggestion is for the networks to be based on the three academic science networks, which could be implemented with little disruption as they already bring together hospitals to work in partnership across the capital.

The King’s Fund chief executive, Chris Ham, said: “The stakes could not be higher, yet the structures now in place are not fit for purpose. Courage will be needed to implement a radically different approach capable of delivering the changes required.”

re you able to Speak Out Safely? Sign our petition to put pressure on your trust to support an open and transparent NHS.

  • 2 Comments

Readers' comments (2)

  • so what was the point in the govt closing and restructuring the London hospitals in the 1990's? anyone else remember the days when Thatcher interfered and started the slow destruction of the NHS.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How quick and convenient that people forget the Tomlinson Report. This was inevitable.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.