Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Carter warns reforms could be 'biggest disaster in history' of NHS


The Royal College of Nursing’s chief executive has today insisted industrial action must remain an option for nurses and warned that the health reforms could become the “biggest disaster in the history of our public services”.

In a keynote address to the union’s 2011 congress, RCN chief executive and general secretary Peter Carter poured scorn on claims that the £20bn of efficiency savings planned by the NHS would be reinvested in services, and that frontline staff and patient care would not be affected by cuts.

He warned government: “In all my time in this job, never before have so many of you spoken to me about industrial action. Friends, we have a very challenging few months and years ahead of us and all avenues must remain open, as long as we remember to always keep our patients at the heart of every decision we make.”

This was “the most important moment in the history of our health service”, he told delegates. “Across the NHS billions, literally billions, of pounds are being slashed from budgets. Nurses and other colleagues are losing their jobs, vacancies are being left unfilled, and the standard of patient care is being threatened.”

Referring to research published by the RCN today, which found nearly 10,000 posts were earmarked to be cut across 21 hospitals trusts, he said: “The majority are clinical posts, and 46% are nursing jobs. That’s almost half.

“Decision makers have told us, that these job losses will be made in a way which won’t impact on patient care,” Mr Carter said.

“That’s impossible. You can’t remove thousands of frontline staff and expect things to carry on as normal.”

Westminster had said that “the £20bn that’s coming out of the NHS will be put back in”, he added. “This is known as the QIPP [quality, innovation, productivity and prevention] process, which to date has been nothing but an illusion.

“We’ve seen no evidence of where this money is going to be reinvested, when that’s going to happen, and who decides on where it goes.

“What’s more, we’re also seeing attacks on vital specialist nurses.

“What the decision makers don’t seem to know is that specialist nurses save the NHS money year on year. They keep patients out of hospital, reduce re-admissions and speed up recovery.”

The Health and Social Care Bill “could well turn out to be the biggest disaster in the history of our public services – if organisations like the RCN are not listened to, and listened to now,” Mr Carter warned.

“Primary care trusts and strategic health authorities have had their problems, but they have empowered nurses from ward to board. We’re worried that given the abolition of PCTs and SHAs, the structures which have enabled nurses to reach senior positions will go with them, leaving us where we started: with decisions made without nursing input.”

The RCN was not calling for nurses on the board of GP commissioning consortia “purely for the sake of it – we’re demanding it because we know what impact it has on patient care, on the delivery of services, and on the health of entire communities”.

He dismissed prime minister’s David Cameron’s claim that the government had decided to “pause, listen, and engage” with concerns over the health bill: “We know that on the ground, where PCTs are shedding staff, senior nurses are leaving the service, and GPs are forming pathfinder consortia, nothing is being paused. “

And he warned Westminster not to pick a fight with nurses over Lord Hutton’s recommendations on public sector pensions. “Let’s just reflect on what’s being asked of you – pay more, work longer, get less,” he told congress.

“What kind of deal is that? The government should listen to us: the NHS pension scheme currently has an annual surplus of £2bn – they do not need this fight at this time.”

Sign our petition today to ensure nurses have a seat on consortia boards! Follow @Aseatontheboard on twitter follow for all the latest campaign news!


Readers' comments (6)

  • I'm shocked! The man has FINALLY come out swinging.

    It's about bloody time!

    Now he needs to turn all this rhetoric into action!

    Come on Carter, you have the support you need, many of us are ready for a fight, so ring the bell, sound the bugle, give the war cry. Please don't let this just be more hot air.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Too right Mike. About time the government had the S--t scared out of them.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sadly I don't think the goverment will care, words are fine but actions speak a lot louder

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I've recently been told my post is "displaced" & am now going through the process of 1:1 one interviews & meetings with HR, as well as being given access to a "restricted jobs list"...the jobs are either a different/lower pay band or much further to travel; but they are apparently suitable positions as far as HR is concerned despite the fact that they are full time posts & I work part time.
    The trust policies about Change to Conditions of Employment has just been altered in a very speedy process designed to push it through in time for this currrent "redisorganisation" of the CMHTs.
    The clients are going to suffer in a very short space of time because the remainder of my colleagues will be trying to cope with increased case loads, little or no available therapeutic input & a newly established IAPT service which is struggling to provide any sort of service at all because the huge level of demand is eyond its capacity( & this was the lynchpin which was supposed to take the strain from the CMHTs).
    I wonder what the trust management have been thinking about when they brought in these planned changes: probably their bonuses for meeting targets & reducing costs.
    The NHS s too valuable a resourrce to leave in the charge of these self serving idiots!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is not based on honourable principles, Peter Carter. If you think it is then I want your definition of honourable.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Specialist nurses reduce hospital admissions, therefore the PCTs have no need to commission those particular hospital services, so speaks for itself ----

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.