Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Eleven trusts put in 'special measures' following Keogh review


Eleven of the 14 hospital providers investigated because of high mortality ratios have been placed in “special measures”, the health secretary has announced.

Jeremy Hunt made the announcement in the Commons this afternoon, as the final reports of the review, led by NHS England medical director Sir Bruce Keogh, were published.

The 11 placed in special measures are:

  • North Cumbria University Hospitals Trust
  • Northern Lincolnshire and Goole Hospitals Foundation Trust
  • Tameside Hospital Foundation Trust
  • United Lincolnshire Hospitals Trust
  • Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals Foundation Trust
  • Burton Hospitals Foundation Trust
  • East Lancashire Hospitals Trust
  • George Eliot Hospital Trust
  • Sherwood Forest Hospitals Foundation Trust
  • Buckinghamshire Healthcare Trust
  • Medway Foundation Trust

The three which are not subject to special measures are:

  • Colchester Hospital University Foundation Trust
  • The Dudley Group Foundation Trust
  • Blackpool Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust

The government has created “special measures” for provider trusts in recent months as part of a new inspection and regulatory regime.

Mr Hunt said putting the 11 trusts into special measures would see them reviewed again within the next year, given additional support by either the NHS Trust Development Authority or Monitor, and have their governance reviewed.

Their progress against action plans drawn up by the Keogh review teams will be monitored. Mr Hunt said they would be monitored by the new chief inspector of hospitals, Sir Mike Richards, whose role is based within the Care Quality Commission. Ultimately, if trusts continue to fail, the “special measures” process can lead to action to remove their board members, or being placed in special administration and broken up.

Mr Hunt said: “This government is deeply proud of our NHS. Staff are the ones who are most betrayed when we ignore poor care.”

He said the CQC had previously “failed to spot any real cause for concern” at half of the 14 trusts, “rating them as compliant with basic standards”. He said this was “worrying”.

Mr Hunt said some had seen management change and improvement recently but said: “Failure or mediocrity is so deeply entrenched at some that further change is necessary.”

Themes identified across the trusts included “professional or geographical isolation”, “absence of a culture of openness”, “lack of ambition”, and problems with governance and assurance.

Mr Hunt said all 14 trusts had been placed “on notice” by Monitor – for foundation trusts – or the NHS Trust Development Authority, for non-foundation trusts.

The review was ordered by the prime minister following the publication of the Francis report into Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust.

More on the Keogh review


Readers' comments (41)

  • Now we have evidence of at least 11 failing "Directors of Nursing"

    These people are a total disgrace to the profession.

    They have permitted staffing levels to fall below anything which could be regarded as safe and have encouraged the employment of excessive numbers of "care assistants" thus diluting skill mix.

    The profession, I hope will take note.

    The eleven should all be immediately referred to the NMC for investigation. They are no longer fit to be called "nurses".

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Jenny - what about medical directors ? Your constant slander of your own profession is a disgrace - yes hold people to account but look at the detail before jumping at the opportunity to keep repeating your poor view of dons no matter what the article

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 16-Jul-2013 10:39 pm

    Unlike some I actually do care for my profession.

    I hold those responsible for the professions demise in total contempt.

    But as you seem to want to avoid criticising Directors of Nursing who is responsible ?

    The band 5 staff nurse that so often is blamed for situation caused by others

    I do not think so !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What about the business managers
    What about ward nurses telling those above them of the problems and it not going further
    Yes we must acknowledge that short comings in care have taken place
    We must also remember that there are a lot more hospitals out there that are doing a good job we should be looking at the good examples as well as the bad or we are in danger of spiraling dowing into a negative self loathing culture

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think the 11 failing boards are at fault here, all the professions they relate to. It's normally the persons at the top who dictate to all and sundry, power trips, control, back handers...... These people should be sacked immediately. Replaced with members from the local CCGs, patients, and the organisations who pay for care to be given, token staff members can then be added to ensure the hospital is represented and to provide balance.

    As things stand, you think, how much worse can it get?!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    Hunt was on Radio 4 yesterday - he is learning (I know some will find that hard to believe).

    Instead of claiming that there isn't evidence that inadequate staffing levels harms patients, he simply stuck to 'but some other hospitals, with similar resources, manage to do it better' as the line. Along with 'and now I'm not directly in control of how the cash gets spent'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • i do not feel it is fair to tar the full hospitals with the same brush. I work for one of those hospitals put on special measures yet I know that the ward I am on does not fall under special measures. And why is the glass still only half full, with only the headlines being mentioned. It should state why patients died at weekends. Not all patients die at weekends due to poor care. Should nurses then keep patients alive at all costs so that we dont get mentioned in Keogh reports. I feel that Bruce and his people should work proper shifts for quite a while before pulling everyone down and tarring everyone with the same brush. Yet again we nurses are the target because we are at the bottom of the pool in hospitals, easy targets.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Actually nurse are not targeted in the report.

    Attention is drawn by Keogh to inadequate nurse staffing levels and poor skill mix !

    Tell me if the so called Heads of Nursing in these Trusts are not responsible for nurse staffing who is ?

    Further if these BIG BOSS nurses don't oversee nurse staffing what do they do and why do we need them ?

    Maybe they are employed to orchestrate th bullying ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Jenny Jones | 17-Jul-2013 3:05 am

    "Unlike some I actually do care for my profession."

    your generalised destructive comments do not demonstrate this. reflective analytical critisism is more helpful.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Jenny Jones | 17-Jul-2013 11:41 am

    "Maybe they are employed to orchestrate th bullying ?"

    Jenny, I have grown to believe that this is precisely the reason for the employment of nurse managers. They do not appear to be of use in any other capacity.

    I completely agree with the rest of your points.

    Prof Nick Black was interviewed early yesterday evening on BBC 24. He spoke of Keogh's anger at the misrepresentation of report information, by Hunt in particular, which was 'leaked' ahead of time. Now there’s something that needs to be investigated! Hunt took the gloves off in Parliament in a shameless (and hopefully damaging to him) overtly political rant NOT based on the Keogh Report. I suspect the nail upon which his ministerial coat is hung, is looking distinctly shoogly. No doubt there will be another chinless, clueless, NHS-hating tory lining up fill his vacant seat.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.