Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


'Emotional support for nurses is as vital as doughnuts for the police'


“It’s not like that on CSI or Cagney and Lacey,” was my less than helpful response.

I was chatting to a good friend who lives in California. Her family home had been burgled. Her husband is a photographer and they – as one likes to imagine most Californians are – are up to their ears in technology. Computers, cameras, jetpacks: between the alarm going off and them getting in 15 minutes later, more than $10,000 of stuff had gone. 

“We’ve found some prints,” mumbled the not-happy-in-his-work police officer. “Good,” said my friend. “Not really,” he replied. “We have a two-year waiting list on checking fingerprints – we won’t get to yours until 2014.” “Might they not have got away by then?” asked my friend, who has spent time in England and is thus well versed in the art of sarcasm. The police officer shrugged. “If I were you, lady,” – in my mind’s eye he was a large, shiny man holding a big bag of doughnuts as he spoke – “I’d put bars on your windows and buy yourself a gun.”

All about investment in public service, I suppose. Californian law enforcement telling householders to arm themselves because there are probably only 17 police officers left in San Francisco and a part-time college student in charge of fingerprints doesn’t just paint a picture of disinvestment – it actually reshapes society, doesn’t it? They move from “if you see a robbery call the police” to “fingerprints are pointless, shoot them!” But I cannot talk about public services being eroded every week without being dull, so can I talk about the police officer? The one I never met?

I am fascinated by what happens to people when they come into a line of work with a clear sense of purpose only to have that drained from them by circumstance, hopelessness, fatigue or a tsunami of unmeetable need. I wonder about the life of the police officer who shrugs and says: “We won’t catch them, buy a gun.” In a similar way, I wonder about nurses who struggled to meet need at Mid Staffordshire. It is easy to condemn them – but might we not all be susceptible to what shapes their work?

I think increasingly people who work in stressful, emotionally laden and drama-heavy jobs become repositories of difficult experiences. They become the witnesses to the robberies or the illness or the struggles of every day life and they are forced to hold or manage the failures of “the system” in order to try to help.

It has always been like this. Nurses, police officers and firefighters have long borne witness to human suffering and they have tried to manage it. Can I just make the very obvious but too often ignored point that to sustain that role and even continue to be able to function they need clinical supervision or – dare I suggest – something even better.

In this climate, the very idea that we need to be doing more to ensure the wellbeing, capacity for emotional labour, and sustainability of public servants is almost unthinkable. 

But perhaps that is all the more reason for doing it. Is there a more important professional issue than sustaining the professionals? Campaigning for, at the very least, non-negotiable and mandatory supervision for all is a must. 

Forming an even more progressive approach to maintaining the health and capacity of nurses, healthcare assistants and other public servants is a crucial step in the protection of quality and wellbeing. Otherwise, we are sacrificing nurses and surely nobody could justify that?

“Emotional support for nurses is as vital as doughnuts for the police”


Readers' comments (4)

  • Yes I totally agree Mark but can I have the emotional support AND the doughnuts?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • maybe the answer lies in the doughnuts? I shall go off immediately and put this to the test.

    Maybe the English should change their habits and instead of offering distressed individuals a cup of tea they should be offering a doughnut - or even tea AND a doughnut! Remark with all that sugar they are comfort foods.

    I agree Mark in this day and age emotional supervision would be a far better alternative than the stiff upper lip and possibly a cigarette in the days of yore.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 21-Feb-2012 2:19 pm

    sorry, last para above should really have been written 'emotional support'!!! I could add while I am back here that this could be beneficial as professional support and supervision.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Emotional support; thats an interesting thought when the trusts seem to want to know where to point the finger of blame whenever things go wrong, instead of supporting those who are embroiled in it. Often the reasons that things go unnoticed or go wrong is when there weren't enough staff around to spot it in time.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.