Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Exclusive: Nurses demand more purchase power over products

  • 5 Comments

Nurses could both improve patient care and save the NHS money if they were handed more control over the purchasing of everyday ward equipment, according to new survey findings.

The joint survey of over 850 nurses by Nursing Times, NHS Supply Chain and the Royal College of Nursing will inform a major new campaign to boost the influence of nursing staff in the NHS procurement process.

A resounding 90% of survey respondents thought senior nurses should have greater influence over what products were used to support patient care.

A similar percentage said they believed nurses could save money if they had greater involvement in the purchasing process and 87% thought patient safety would be improved through close working between nursing staff and clinical supplies teams.

More than half, 55%, said they had already seen areas where savings could be made by changing the clinical products they used, for example through standardisation or reducing waste.

“All NHS trusts should have a clinical nurse specialist in procurement to assist in getting the best deals, without compromising patient care”

Survey respondent

Just under a third branded current purchasing at their organisation as either fairly or very “ineffective”, while around half thought there was at least some scope for making savings through more cost-effective procurement of things like gloves and syringes.  

A general theme from respondents was that purchasing better quality products was more cost-effective in the long-term than supply teams always opting for the least expensive alternative.

Others noted that “brand loyalty” and historical use of the same product by trusts could be a challenge to getting better alternatives onto the ward or accessible to nursing teams.

“Using the cheapest product is not always value for money as you can end up using twice as much as one that is slightly more expensive,” said one nurse.

Another said they believed that all NHS trusts should have a clinical nurse specialist in procurement “to assist in getting the best deals, without compromising patient care and retaining quality”.

The biggest barriers to nurses getting involved in purchasing were lack of time, rules preventing them from doing so and lack of support from their employer, the survey found.

One respondent said: “I think that nurses need to have the time to get involved, and this needs to be lead from the director of nursing.”

Asked which types of products they felt could be purchased more efficiently at their organisation, 75% said dressings, 65% said gloves and 64% said disposable wipes. Incontinence products and syringes were also chosen by around half of respondents.

Starting next week, nurses will be encouraged to look for ways to save money on such essentials in a major campaign being launched by the RCN and NHS Supply Chain.

As exclusively revealed by Nursing Times last July, the campaign’s organisers estimate nurses working together with procurement managers could save more than £30m – the equivalent of 1,000 nursing jobs – by streamlining the purchasing of basics like wipes, incontinence products and cannulae.

The Small Changes, Big Difference campaign, which was also developed with input from the Clinical Procurement Specialist Network, will be launched on 24 March and was the brainchild of Mandie Sunderland, director of nursing at Nottingham University Hospitals Trust.

“Small changes really can make big differences, and everyone in nursing has a part to play”

Janet Davies

Janet Davies, the RCN’s director of nursing and service delivery, and the college’s representative on the NHS Supply Chain’s customer board, said: “Making the right choices about which equipment and supplies the NHS buys can make a huge difference to patient safety.

“Nurses, midwives and healthcare assistants use clinical products every day and they know what works best for patients, and which are easiest to use,” she said.

She also highlighted that a third of what the average hospital spent on operating costs was used to buy clinical supplies.

Surgical gloves

“But nursing staff can feel that they don’t have a role in addressing that,” she said.

“Even when nursing staff do have a say in procurement, it’s often very late in the process. We want nurses, midwives and HCAs involved from the start, and we want them to understand how important their opinions are.

“That’s what this campaign is about,” she said. “Because small changes really can make big differences, and everyone in nursing has a part to play.”

  • 5 Comments

Readers' comments (5)

  • Few good examples of the recent, matron's purchase power:
    Plate warmer: 650 pounds (already present kitchen trolley has got an option to stow 40 plates)
    Paper shredder (second within a year) 350 pounds
    Electronic door lock system: 2000 pounds. Sadly, it had to be disarmed due to large number of non-DOLS patients.


    Multiply that by circa 7000 inpatient wards and you will get 20,000,000 pounds of completely wasted taxpayers money.

    PS recently a large, sophisticated cardiac monitor has been delivered to our ward. When checked, the price stands at around 3000 quid. No one knows why it was delivered to our small medical ward and nobody claimed it so far. I bet it is already paid by the taxpayers!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • nurses purchasing power, getting stuff from the pound shop instead of nhs logistics, for basic stuff like razors,

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Great idea
    So you send hospital stuff up the £shop everytime you need razors and call that a saving.

    Lets ignore time spent, petty cash processing costs and the lack of any indemnity if patients get hurt by your bargain bin razors...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Working with procurement opened my eyes significantly. It is a lot more complex than what nurses think.

    As a specialist nurse, I see nurses waste money on a daily basis by using products inapproriately even though when questioned they do know the appropriate usage. I have been involved in changing current products and also introducing new ones being accused by some nurses of only doing it to save money. When any product is changed, you need to prove why it needs to be changed and if you have explored all options in the process of fairness. Any improvement in patient care or cost savings needs to be proved by hard evidence. This takes evalauations and time.

    Nurses need to engage with their procurement officer if they want changes in products but also need to be prepared for the extra work that is required to prove it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This idea could introduce many relatively minor but nonetheless positive improvements to patient care. My company has demonstrated our products to a number of continence-specialist nursing staffs, and received very positive feedback. The purchasing and/or trialling systems within the NHS are so far unapproachable.
    True, there will be additional effort involved, but if the end result is that those at "the coal face" get to provide a better, possibly more cost-effective service, isn't that what we're all striving for?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.