Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Fee rise unavoidable, says regulator


The nursing and midwifery regulator has admitted that even if it accepts a government grant of £20m, nurses’ and midwives’ annual registration fees will still have to increase.

Ministers offered the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) a one-off grant to ease an unpopular 58% increase in the fees.

A Department of Health spokeswoman said the money would “protect nurses and midwives from the full impact of a proposed registration fee rise of almost 60%”.

But the NMC’s chief executive Jackie Smith said that nurses and midwives would still face a hike in fees, even if the body accepted the grant.

She told the Commons health select committee that there was a shortfall between the amount of money generated by fees and the cost of running the organisation.

Fitness to practise hearings cost £43 million and the general cost of running the NMC is £30m - a total of £73 million - but the amount of money generated by fees - the organisation’s only income - is £52m, she said.

The NMC has recently consulted on increasing the annual fee from £76 to £120.

But unions condemned the move, saying it was “inappropriate” to increase fees while NHS workers are in the midst of a pay freeze.

“We recognise that this is a particularly difficult time to even think about increasing fees,” said Ms Smith.

“We recognise the impact but we are afraid that there is no other alternative.

“Even if the council accepts the grant, fees will still need to go up to deliver in terms of fitness to practise.”

The NMC’s chairman Mark Addison said that the £20m grant, if accepted by the council, would be used to clear the backlog of fitness to practise cases.

“The focus of the £20m will be linked to the clearance of the backlog,” he said.

MPs also asked Ms Smith whether part-time or graduate nurses should pay a lower fee.

She said: “We looked at a number of things but it is very difficult for us to administer a system that has variable fees - we do not know where everyone works, we do not know how many hours they work.”

The NMC, which regulates the UK’s 670,000 nurses and midwives, said that in the last few years it has received an “unprecedented increase” in the number of referrals about the fitness to practise of nurses and midwives.

To cope with the soaring cost of fitness to practise hearings, the organisation said it would raise registration fees - which nurses and midwives have to pay to work in the UK.

It has a backlog of 1,400 cases which still need to be adjudicated on.

Ms Smith said she hoped the case load would be cleared by the end of 2014.

“We have to invest our time and resources in clearing problems in the fitness to practise process,” she added.

The NMC Council will meet on October 25 to decide whether or not to accept the grant.


Readers' comments (4)

  • My version including the bits left out:
    “We recognise that this is a particularly difficult time to even think about increasing fees,” said Ms Smith "But we will go ahead anyway".
    "Fitness to practise hearings cost £43 million and the general cost of running the NMC is £30m - a total of £73 million " - "These are very large numbers and I have no comprehension of what £73m looks like or how long it will feed a family of four but when your in the realm of sky high figures one tends to lose all touch with reality. "

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • there is something very wrong with this system. How is taking more money from nurses going to fix it?
    Please come forward with concrete and valid explanations.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Every nurse in the United Kingdom should refuse to pay their fees full stop. They can't strike us all off can they?!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Other clinical organisations pay more. If you take the prposed fee, it will be covered by a day's pay. That is reasoable.
    What is not reasonable is the lack of transparency about the management of the finances of the NMC. How much inefficiency is there because they are an organisation that is "not fit for purpose". Nurses accused of misconduct have to wait for years for the cases to be heard. That is unfair and cruel.
    If the increase in fee is used to ensure thet the NMC works, then OK , but not to prop up the failing regime.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.