Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Government backs protected training budgets


Trusts will be restricted from plundering nurses’ training funds after the government backed calls to “protect” education budgets.

Senior figures have told Nursing Times the move could see an end to the £5bn NHS training budget being treated as an easy target for cuts.

The government’s full response to the NHS Future Forum report, published last week, said it agreed with those who felt that education and training funding should be “protected”.

It said “transparent systems” would be established to ensure “organisations in receipt of education and training money are held to account for using it for the education and training of the NHS workforce”.

A national education and training outcomes framework will be developed, setting out expectations on providers, and health secretary Andrew Lansley will be placed under “an explicit duty…to maintain a system for professional education and training”.

Many clinical leaders are interpreting the proposals to mean that training budgets funding will be ring-fenced. A spokesman for the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges said that while the government “hasn’t used the words ’ring-fenced budget’” in its response this week, “that’s clearly the implication”.

Royal College of Nursing acting education advisor Gill Robertson agreed, saying: “I’m hoping that if education and training funding is to be protected that it means exactly that.”

But she questioned who would hold providers to account and emphasised that Health Education England, which from April 2013 will allocate training money and oversee how it is spent, needed “teeth”.

Ms Robertson also highlighted the fact that places on pre-registration nursing courses had been cut this year and said it was no good ring-fencing the budget while reducing the overall funding pot.

There are no figures on how much of the £5bn multi-professional education and training budget (MPET) – of which about £2bn is for “non-medical” staff - is spent in the way it is intended. But anecdotally it is widely agreed that the money is often diverted to other areas, especially when finances are tight.

University of the West of England pro vice-chancellor and executive dean Helen Langton, a former nurse, said: “Some trusts spend it on what it’s meant to be spent on but it can be easy to divert and hide the money.”

Three years ago, Nursing Times’ Time Out for Training campaign won guarantees from seven of the 10 strategic health authorities, which are in charge of distributing the money, to invest MPET budgets entirely in training during 2008-09.

But analysis by Nursing Times last month showed in 2010-11 SHAs underspent MPET budgets by hundreds of millions of pounds and training money was being used to meet the government’s pledge to recruit 4,200 health visitors.

Council of Deans of Health policy director Matthew Hamilton said: “SHAs are allocated part of the MPET budget but it’s not always exactly clear how much of that is spent on education and training.”

The proposals in the government document would “make it much clearer how much is spent [on education] and on what it is spent,” he said.

The plans will be set out in more detail this autumn.

Meanwhile, Nursing Times has discovered this week that money from the “non medical education fund” – much of which is meant to support pre-registration nurses’ training – is being used to compensate trusts for training junior doctors on placements.

In South East Coast, £1.2m of NMET money is being diverted for this purpose.

This is despite the fact that pre-registration nursing placements are already underfunded nationally by around £400m a year, while undergraduate medical placements are overfunded by around £120m.

Ms Robertson said it was unacceptable for NMET to be used “for propping up medical staff”.

An SHA spokeswoman said: “These monies are not ring-fenced for individual training streams, and the SHA makes funding decisions…to ensure the best outcomes for the NHS in the South East Coast.”


How the government plans to “protect” training:

*Transparent systems to hold organisations to account for spending money on education and training

*National education and training outcomes framework to set out expectations on providers

*”Explicit duty” for the health secretary to maintain a system for professional education and training

*Health Education England to be launched in April 2013 to allocate training funds to local “networks” of trusts and oversee how money is spent.

*The government will “emphasise the importance of the right investment in education and training” to ensure the right values, behaviours and team-working are developed.


Readers' comments (6)

  • About bloody time!!! Now why don't they start protecting our pay, increments, pensions and jobs, too!!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • That good to know we already have to pay have any outside training we would like to do, struggling to afford that if we had to pay more i do not think i get any training done.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I suspect this is the same rhetoric that the Government issued re protecting 'front-line' staff. Training budgets for nurses are already being cut and front-line jobs are already being cut. The knives wielded by senior managers and the Government has done nothing to stop them...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It seems to me to be a 'carrot' after the pay, increments, pensions and job cuts. Will we fall for it...probably, as we have done historically, and the Govenment know that

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Ha Ha! An old story - Training budgets are 'protected' - fewer staff on the wards and fewer wards means less staff released to train and so falling standards - training at FEIs is 'protected' and so there are lots of newly qualified and registered nurses who cannot get jobs!
    And still we do nothing!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ...but Trusts don't!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.