Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

GP practices are to be rated by a new inspector, the health secretary is set to announce


Family doctors are to face a tough new inspection regime under plans announced by Jeremy Hunt.

The health secretary will put forward proposals to introduce a chief inspector of general practice.

The new chief inspector will devise and implement a new system so GP practices will be given ratings, such as those used by the schools inspector Ofsted, and will champion patients’ interests, officials said.

Speaking on Thursday at a leadership summit held by think-tank The King’s Fund, Mr Hunt will divulge plans to implement the “rigorous system of inspection” to ensure that GP practices are providing “effective and responsive care”, a Department of Health spokeswoman said.

Mr Hunt will also embellish on plans to provide one-to-one care for elderly patients.

He will say that getting care can be “confusing”, especially for older people who need more than one service.

The minister is expected to tell delegates that patients feel there is “no credible alternative” in out of hours care, so are forced to attend accident and emergency wards - contributing to the current pressures on A&E units.

He will say: “As a member of the public, I want to know my GP. And I want my GP to be someone that knows me and my family.

“Yet we’ve turned GP practices into places where it’s a daily challenge for receptionists to cope with huge call volumes and GPs to get through to all the people they need to see.

“I do not blame NHS staff for this. They are working extremely hard in the face of rising demand, in fact it’s they who are telling me how much better things could be organised.”

Dr Clare Gerada, chair of the Royal College of GPs, said: “We support anything that will promote quality in general practice and are open to working with the government and the Care Quality Commission to devise a system that is going to create the right incentives to improve standards, including whether there is a case for introducing a chief inspector of primary care.

“But this must be done without adding to bureaucracy or creating a crude system of overall ratings for GP practices,” she said.

“We need to be clear that any new system of inspection for primary care would be proportionate, supportive, influenced by the [GP] profession, and that it will add value to what the CQC is already doing,” she added.


Are you able to Speak Out Safely? Sign our petition to put pressure on your trust to support an open and transparent NHS.


Readers' comments (2)

  • At last! Although now we have given them all the budgets who is going to monitor how the money is spent.
    Will we loose some the way we did with Fundholding.
    Sadly doctors seem to need extra financial incentives to do anything, would measurable benefit for the patients not be enough?
    There should be 24 hour cover by the GP practices which are large enough to cover this level of service.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How are many of the elderly going to be able to afford this 'one to one care'?

    "Care cap becoming 'irrelevant' as 'crisis-mode' system excludes all but a few, report finds
    The number of elderly people receiving help with their care has dropped by a fifth in just four years as cash-strapped councils have begun “rationing” support only to those at “crisis-point”, a report by a leading think-tank shows."

    The report welcomes the reforms being implement in the wake of the landmark Dilnot Commission to prevent people being forced to sell their homes.

    "Criteria for support have become so tight that long-awaited Government reforms, including a cap on the amount people should have to spend on care, could become “irrelevant” because only those in most dire need would ever qualify, the King’s Fund warned."

    "... it warns that for many people, money is no longer the “primary concern” because they cannot even qualify for care until they are so frail that they can no longer live in their own home."

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.