Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

HCAs could be policed with 'blacklist'


The government is considering setting up a “black list” of care home workers to improve public protection in a scheme that Nursing Times understands could be extended to healthcare assistants.

Under the proposal, recommended by the Health and Care Professions Council, a “negative register” would be set up listing staff that had been found unfit to practise as an adult social care worker.

Employers would be able to check the register before deciding whether to employ someone. The scheme is similar to one introduced for teachers in April 2012 and is also used in parts of Australia.

At the request of the Department of Health, the council – which regulates professions including radiographers and occupational therapists as well as social workers – is investigating how much the model would cost in adult social care.

Nursing Times understands the idea is also attracting a lot of interest from organisations involved in discussions on future approaches to regulating healthcare support workers.

An HCPC spokeswoman told Nursing Times the council thought the negative register model had the potential to be extended to NHS staff.   

She said: “We have only looked initially at adult social care. However, we think this model might potentially be scaleable to other parts of the health and social care workforce.”

As well as healthcare support workers, it has been suggested it could be introduced for NHS managers.

However, it is not known whether this would affect only very senior staff, such as chief executives, or also include lower layers of management, who may already covered by registration with another regulator.

Potential models of regulation for HCAs are attracting fresh attention ahead of the imminent publication of Robert Francis QC’s public inquiry report into Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust. The report is widely expected recommend changes to how HCAs are trained and regulated.

The government’s current stated position is that it favours the introduction of voluntary regulation backed by a minimum set of standards. But a compulsory system has long been favoured by groups such as Unison and the Royal College of Nursing.

RCN head of policy Howard Catton said the negative register idea represented a “small step forward” in attempts to introduce regulation for HCAs.

But he said the college would need to hear more details about how individuals would be added to the register. “We would need to be sure it isn’t some form of blacklist – face doesn’t fit – subjective judgement,” he said.

But Unison head of nursing Gail Adams argued that a negative register would not prevent harm occurring in the first place.

“Supposing the harm is catastrophic like that caused by support workers that worked at Winterbourne View? You need the right person with right skills in the first place,” she said.

Ms Adams also warned that such a system could fall foul of human rights legislation that protected a right to a fair trial.

The RCN and other unions have been working with the body Skills for Health on developing training standards and a code of conduct for care workers in health and social care.

It was asked to carry out the work by the government and is expected to define minimum training or induction standards for a range of “core” health and social care support tasks.

However, Mr Catton told Nursing Times unions have asked for an addendum to be included in the final document making clear they do not see the standards and code of conduct as a solution on their own and they have serious concerns about a voluntary approach.


Readers' comments (6)

  • Have the Nursing Times and RCN Howard Catton heard of Wales?
    Please Nursing Times when you talk about "Government" please remember that Health and Social Care are devolved so you are only talking about ENGLAND.
    In this instance England is behind thentimes as Wales already have a code of conduct for support workers working in care homes and also a code of conduct for employers too.
    This is undertaken via the Care Council for Wales. The Care Council for Wales (Care Council) is the regulatory body for the workforce in social work and social care. The Care Council has the statutory remit to register and regulate the social workers and social care managers and workers and regulates their education and training. It is also has the remit for workforce development and planning.

    Please get your facts right.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Whatever the name or model anyone name included in the list should have a right to a hearing and their employers should have undertook their own fair and balanced investigation as outlined in their Discipinary Procedures ( if this is required after a timely initial investigation). Please HCPC get this right and lets have a consultation on the proposals.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • voluntary regulation has been banded about for the last 10 years and nothing has been produced that is effective unless there is a more structured regulation process it is enevitable that some HCA's will get lost in the HR process.#
    Please please can we have regulation of the HCA's within the health sector to ensure we are providing people in our care with staff who have the right attitudes behaviours and beliefs and are able to care for them in a dignified and respectful manner without the threat of abuse.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If HCAs are not offered any training or regulation how can the be held responsible for what they do or do not do and how can they be blacklisted for any failings? Surely it is their employers, if they are unable to fulfil their conditions and duty towards their employees, who should be blacklisted.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I worked with a Care Assistant in Devon, it recently came to my notice that she has a warning marker on her CRB Check for giving a patient an injection of insulin, she was reported to her employer by the district nurse and sacked for gross misconduct, this dose could have been fatal to the patient if the district nurse had given her a further dose, i have worked with this girl and similer things have happened and she is still working in care homes, she should be blacklisted before she causes more harm, her name is Sherina Cornish, and she works in the Devon area Exeter and Okehampton, Be Warned Check her CRB.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is horrendous reading! Have the Police been informed of her actions?

    I think that this Sherina person needs to have her details publicised as widely as possible so we can avoid any Harold Shipman type incidents

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.