Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Hospital and care home bosses to face prosecution

  • 10 Comments

Directors in charge of care homes and hospitals can be charged with criminal offences if there are failures in care at their organisations under new plans to stem cases of appalling treatment witnessed at Winterbourne View and Stafford Hospital.

Care and support minister Norman Lamb will say that those in charge of organisations where abuse occurs should be held to account.

He will unveil new plans to address the loophole in the system where providers responsible for failures in care can escape prosecution.

Mr Lamb said the proposals will make it easier for the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to prosecute providers and their directors where there are clear failures to meet very basic standards of care.

Since the CQC took charge of regulation of health and social care in 2009, there have been no such prosecutions, a Department of Health spokeswoman said.

She said that providers responsible for appalling care can escape prosecution, even in the worst cases, because the CQC can only prosecute when it has previously issued a warning notice to the provider and it has failed to comply with that warning notice.

Officials want to remove the layer of protection for health and care providers and enable the CQC to be able to prosecute without giving notice.

“Scandals like Winterbourne View and Mid-Staffs have damaged confidence in our health and care system,” Mr Lamb said.

“Part of our commitment to rebuilding that trust comes from making sure that people at all levels are held to account for failings when they occur.

“Whilst there must be a sharper focus on corporate accountability, more needs to be done to ensure those responsible for leading a care organisation are up to the job. I hope that providers and people who use services and their families will respond to this consultation as we look to take these proposals forward.”

Mr Lamb will also introduce a “fit and proper” test for directors and if they fail the assessment they will be sacked.

The proposals are part of a wider remit of changes to the way the CQC regulates health and social care providers.

Mr Lamb said the new plans would seek to impose fines rather than jail terms following prosecutions.

He told ITV’s Daybreak: “We’re not jailing but it would be unlimited fines and it will be for the awful cases.

“If you break the fundamental standards that you have to comply with as a provider of care, and you are responsible for that, there are consequences, and I think that’s what the public expect.”

He added: “There’s also a culture when awful things happen, there’s a cover up, people get paid off, they get gagged from talking about it. That has to end.

“These pay offs have to end and people at the top of the organisation should be held to account.”

Are you able to Speak Out Safely? Sign our petition to put pressure on your trust to support an open and transparent NHS.


  • 10 Comments

Readers' comments (10)

  • michael stone

    The test of this one, is if any of the people at the top are actually prosecuted - so far, it almost never happens, and I'm far from certain it will happen much in the future either ?

    And, if this threat is there, will it lead to better behaviour, or cleverer 'fiddling of the records' to make it harder to prove any 'poor care' case ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The problem is that the Care Quality Commission is not fit for purpose either and has not been prepared to take action against failing services even when it has been happening over a long period of time. Maybe the links are too close between the failing service and the CQC, that's where the executive staff came from! The DOH and NHS promote failures do they not? easier that addressing the problems and cleaning things up.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The CQC are not fit for purpose so how can they be regulators?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • tinkerbell

    doesn't a judge decide what the sentence will be fine or imprisonment?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Butttt! It may be a step in the right direction. Lets face it, it's usually some hard face SOB who rams through government policy. If they now think there's a chance of a little bit of chokey, they might think twice about it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Coolmore Mafia"! (Google it).
    Owned race horses when they got that name.
    Owned Winterbourne and the other places in that group where abuses were rife.
    Nurseries where children die and they change the name to hide the history, (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-23100844 ).
    Barchester Healthcare where they generated £1.4 Billion debt (yes Billion) on a sale and leaseback scheme.
    Even (allegedly) tried to cheat Sir Alex Ferguson out of millions from an agreement made when they owned Man United.
    A fitness check for owners of Care Homes as well please.
    Gagging Order.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Does this include MPs?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    Anonymous | 5-Jul-2013 0:44 am

    Probably not if MPs get to vote on it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There already exists plenty of scope for prosecutions. The CQC has already failed in its role. This will make no difference. It is a distraction and will not result in any action being taken against anyone.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Believe it when I see it, has anyone been held to account for Mid Staffs, has Nicholson gone yet or any of the management.

    Who is going to be held responsible for poor care due to short-staffing, poor skill mix, inadequate training, increased staff stress and sickness levels?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs