Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

New powers for NMC to speed up FTP cases agreed by health secretary


The Nursing and Midwifery Council is to get new powers designed to speed up the fitness to practise process in the wake of the Mid Staffordshire scandal, it has been announced.

Prime minster David Cameron promised to reform the NMC when he responded to the publication of the Francis report into care failings at the Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust in February. He demanded to know why at that point no nurses from the trust had been struck off.

Only one registrant who worked at the West Midlands trust has since been removed from the register while 11 out of 15 cases where the NMC found there was a case to answer are still ongoing, four years after the scandal first broke.

Mr Cameron asked the Law Commission to review the NMC’s “outdated and inflexible” decision making processes. However, there were concerns any recommendations could take up to four years to implement.

In a letter to Labour MP John Healey, seen by Nursing Times, health secretary Jeremy Hunt confirms the changes will be bought forward.

“In light of the recommendations in the Francis inquiry, the government felt that it was advisable to proceed quickly,” he wrote.

The changes are now expected to come into force in a year’s time. They will mean investigating committees, who examine initial allegations to decide if there is a case to answer, will be replaced with case examiners employed directly by the NMC while the regulator will also be able to review these initial decisions.

The changes will bring the NMC’s procedures in line with other professional regulators such as the General Medical Council.

Royal College of Nursing chief executive and general secretary Peter Carter said in principle the new powers were a “positive move” but more detail was needed about how the proposals would work in practice.

Nursing Times understands a case will be reviewed by two case examiners to ensure decisions are consistent. A decision has not yet been made on whether one of the case examiners must be a registrant. However, that is the model used by the GMC and Nursing Times understands the NMC believes there are advantages to this system.

NMC chief executive and registrar Jackie Smith welcomed the move.

She said: “We at the NMC are ten years behind in how we can investigate concerns about the fitness to practise of nurses and midwives because of our outdated legal framework. The prime minister is delivering on his promise of reform, made when the Francis report was published.” 


Readers' comments (25)

  • So who will pay for this- us?
    If the public want protecting maybe they should pay as we are not having any say in how we regulate ourselves as a supposed profession.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • is the GMC Model satisfactory?

    is there an increase in fees for this change?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • nursing training should concentrate on more skills for nurses not fast way to strike off

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Of course the process should be speeded up. It is cruel to keep someone waiting for a hearing for up to 6 years as has happened in the past.
    I remain concerned about the number of nurses who are referred to the NMC because the care that a patient has had has not had satisfactory when the problem has been a system failure and the nurse has been doing their best but is short staffed on the unit and has been refused help.
    I sat on the NMC panels and the nurse was always to blame, never those who reached their targets and emptied their unit in a shorter time.
    Nurses must learn to speak up when they are short staffed and record that they have done so and refuse to have yet more patients admitted to the ward when they do not have the staff or the skills to provide the care.
    When can we have Corporate manslaughter applied to the Trust Boards please? This might make them listen and start putting and funding good and safe patient care ahead of their bonuses.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    The requirement is to filter out, very quickly, complaints that are really simply down to things like 'confusion', etc, so that those never get anywhere near lengthy NMC investigations.

    However, as everyone on the professional side often becomes hugly 'defensive' as soon as 'complaint' is heard, which means that nobody properly discusses it at the local level, to work out if the cause was 'pretty-much just confusion and crossed wires', so these complaints tend to escalate and become very drawn-out.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Will this stop the NMC colluding with miscreant Trusts againsts well supported nurse whistle blowers via the use of win-today-pay-later lawyers who return to re-vamp and re-present original pre-disciplinary allegation case material already consigned to the bin or is there now to be a new "Thomas Cromwell School of Clinical Prosecution" approach to fastlane strike-offs implemented?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 24-May-2013 2:02 pm and 2:59 pm is absolutely right.

    Until we have a really "just" culture seriously influenced by "human factors" in which blame is not the first instinct of employersthen stream lining the NMC procedures will not make the step change needed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Agree with ALL the above.

    If there is yet further fee hikes to the NMC then I am going to walk.

    With the vast majority of positions on NHS Jobs advertised at bottom band 5, it will soon be unsustainable to keep this body of parasites in clover.

    I would get more respect and sleep sounder at night if I was working in Marks and Spencer, as many of my colleagues already do.

    I would NEVER advise anyone to enter nursing. It just isn't worth it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • tinkerbell

    most people who have lost a loved one don't want to point the finger of blame or sue, they just want an honest answer. No amount of money can bring back someone you love. It is vitally important that we have a duty of candour.

    Honesty heals, lies hurt.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    tinkerbell | 25-May-2013 1:26 pm

    Yes - and the 'defensive barrier' you often get, makes you 'see a conspiracy', which is why so many things turn in to time-consuming complaints !

    I'm not sure how to get to 'open and honest first responses' from NHS staff, but unless we get pretty-much to that, this issue about complaints will never be resolved, in my view. It does involve the 'perhaps there isn't really any blame' thinking that Roger Kline touched on, but that isn't how it works at present - the solution involves 'trusting others to be decent', which is a challenge.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.