Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


'Like donkey jackets, listening to dissenters has gone out of fashion'


In the 1980s we tended to go on a lot of marches – CND, anti-Apartheid, Support the Miners, anti-racism.

We marched in support of higher education to reclaim the streets as safe places for women. Sometimes we bumped into marches coming the other way that were against the slaughter of whales or fox-hunting and we might join each other, amalgamate our banners (“Support the Miners and the Foxes”), pick up a group of Japanese tourists who loved the chanting and couldn’t see the stuff about the whales, and head for the nearest free open-air concert.

I remember once being on a candlelit march with a few thousand other nurses expressing our concern about resources in the NHS. I was chatting to a police officer, who said he liked these marches.

“You have a better class of demonstrator here,” he said, going on to explain that he and his colleagues tended to judge a demonstration, and its validity, by the “type” of people involved in it. They had little time for the anti-Apartheid movement it seems because, mostly, the marchers wore jeans and shouted. This to them meant that Apartheid, whatever that was, couldn’t be so bad – being against it attracted the wrong sort of person.

It is not uncommon for governments to be reassured of their “rightness” by looking at those people who oppose them. I can’t help wondering how, with the health bill, that is working now for the current government when David Cameron asks Andrew Lansley who is for them and who is against.

“Well, Dave, we have the usual dissenters, you know the ones in donkey jackets who didn’t go to public school and always disagree with us.”

“Oh, I don’t care about them, Andy. Anyone else?”

“Well, there are some rumblings among the doctors.”

“The doctors? I thought they liked us? I said there were tens of thousands of them up and down the country loving us the other day.”

“Yes Dave, yes you did. And you’re right. It’s just that we can’t find them. And other doctors, like the RCGP and the BMA, they don’t seem so keen.”

“They’ll come round. Anyone else?”

“Well there are the nurses.”

“The nurses? What on earth has it got to do with them? Most of them are girls aren’t they? Do they have a vote?”

“Yes Dave, apparently they do. We were rather hoping to distract them with talk about old-fashioned values and hats but they’re not buying it. They seem to think we want to turn the NHS into an under-resourced Goan street market.”

“It’s a fine model, Andy. Anyone else?”

“Er… yes Dave. I’m afraid the physiotherapists are against us too.”

“Andy, physiotherapists aren’t against anything with the possible exception of poor posture – how can they be getting involved? Who is on our side?”

“George Osborne, Nick Clegg, the bankers – they love the fact that most of the attention is on health now. Er… the homeopaths haven’t decided one way or another yet.”

“We need more people on our side Andy. Make some calls. Try Cheryl Cole.”

If the right and wrong of an argument is, in part, illustrated by the people who form each side, this mish-mash of a health bill should be dead in the water. People with a vested interest in a good health service – the ones who understand it best – are lining up to oppose it. Perhaps that just shows us that this bill is about political ideology rather than service improvement?

Mark Radcliffe is a senior lecturer and author of Gabriel’s Angel.


Readers' comments (9)

  • tinkerbell


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yes exactly but still they persist in their lies and downright arrogance in pushing ahead regardless of public & health professions opinion or the democratic proccess. aagh !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • tinkerbell

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dissent went as the Rcn was used to undermine the proper unions.
    Am I the only one to wonder why managers and educators are so keen on allowing the Rcn to address staff - yet dead set against inviting Unison et al. Might it be that the college are lap dogs who never march, demonstrate or complain????

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • tinkerbell

    London NHS Rally 7 March.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    Anonymous | 17-Feb-2012 9:05 am

    Perhaps the RCN should be only a 'learned professional body' of which all nurses should be members, and not also acting as a trade union ? Then you could all take your pick of what union you were represented by, and the RCN could stick to 'nursing expertise' ?

    Just a thought !

    'Might it be that the college are lap dogs who never march, demonstrate or complain????'

    I think the problem re the RCN, is it tries to influence the Goverment, and there is a balance between co-operative persuasion and outright disagreement - recently the RCN seems to have moved from the 'persuasion via co-operation' to the 'outright opposition' position of the Health Bill. So at least it has finally adopted what I consider to be the only reasonable position, at this stage.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The world of the average Mr/Mrs UK is different to that of Planet Cameron. Mr Cameron is not interested in the opinion of the underdog, once he has made his mind up he will not listen, and ignores the voice of reason, he does not want to know, as far as he is concerned he is right and we are wrong. He only pretends to listen when an election looms. I am ashamed to say I voted for him in the last election as I was very unhappy with the Labour government (stupid me) won't make that mistake again. You live and learn.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • tinkerbell

    We all make mistakes, you weren't to know, they blatantly lied. but as you say we learn from them. They have broken the nations trust on this one. We are Mr & Mrs average the majority of the UK. They would have us the 'have nots and the have yachts' as far as OUR NHS is concerned.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    tinkerbell | 20-Feb-2012 8:17 am

    Politicians sometimes blatantly lie, but more often they do not fully describe the effects of their plans, are very selective in which effects they discuss, and then supply a 'motive' which they feel will persuade people to go along with their plan (often the 'motivation' the politicians describe will not be their true motivation - they use whatever argument they believe will be effective).

    And I wish 'we all make mistakes, you weren't to know' worked itself a bit more into NHS culture, especially with regard to staff admitting to 'honest' mistakes (but I'm drifting there into complaints behaviour and whistle-blowing).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.