Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Mid Staffs nurse struck off after patient death


A former nurse at Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust has been struck off by the Nursing and Midwifery Council after she failed to ensure a diabetic patient received vital insulin medication.

Senior staff nurse Ann King was struck off the register by an NMC fitness to practise panel on Friday while ward manager Jeannette Coulson was handed a three year caution order. Both were found guilty of errors that contributed to the death of 66-year-old Gillian Astbury in April 2007.

Ms Astbury was admitted to Stafford Hospital after a fall which fractured her pelvis. Despite her need for insulin being documented and prescribed, both nurses did not check her notes or ensure observations were taken and that the insulin was given. Ms Astbury went for 48 hours without insulin and ultimately slipped into a coma and died.

The NMC panel found the fitness to practise of both was impaired and their behaviour amounted to misconduct.

Ms Coulson and Ms King, who have both now retired from nursing, were also found guilty of a series of failures between 2005 and 2010, including swearing at patients and lying about putting fresh dressings on wounds.

In a letter to the NMC, Ms King blamed “systemic issues including poor staffing levels” at the trust, along with a poor ward layout and the failure of management to listen to staff concerns.

She said she and her colleagues “did their best under difficult conditions where staff who left were not replaced and the trust was concerned only with balancing the books”.

She accepted mistakes had been made in the care of Ms Astbury and claimed better staffing levels would have given her time to read Ms Astbury’s notes.

But the panel found Ms Astbury died “following a lack of care”. It said: “The panel is concerned that Mrs King, whilst admitting mistakes and expressing remorse, appeared keen to shift responsibility to others. The panel is clear that, during her shift, she was the nurse in charge of the team, with responsibility for [Ms Astbury].”

The panel accepted there were wider problems at the trust and that Ms King was not “solely responsible”, but added: “The failings of others cannot detract from the personal responsibility and accountability of Ms King for her own practice.”

Confirming the striking off order the panel said it was “the only sanction sufficient to protect the public and to maintain proper standards of conduct so as to maintain trust and confidence in the profession and in the NMC as a regulator.”

In relation to Ms Coulson, the panel said “the failings of others were of greater significance in contributing to [Ms Astbury’s] death than those of Ms Coulson.”

It concluded striking her off the nursing register would be “disproportionate” and instead chose a three year suspension.

This it said would “meet the public interest in conveying a message to the public and the profession about the importance of effective management and leadership in promoting and sustaining good clinical practice”.

Are you able to Speak Out Safely? Sign our petition to put pressure on your trust to support an open and transparent NHS.



Readers' comments (17)

  • To have a patient die like this is unforgivable but surely other nurses and doctors were involved in Ms Astbury's care during that period.

    Is this a case of using them as scapegoats for the whole Mid Staffs episode, publicise their punishment and all will be well again.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It does seem a bit suspect that only two people have been dealt with when many others must have been involved. However other professional failings are superficially mentioned in the report, so it is possible that others are either in the pipeline or they are dealing with multiple offenders first.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Take note !

    Any registered nurse working in an understaffed and badly managed environment is clearly at risk of being scapegoated ! -

    We do not know all the details of theses cases but for sure we know Martin Yeats is enjoying a well funded NHS pension + the payoff received for failure !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I find it disheartening that when these two Nurses mentioned the mitigating circumstances of staffing levels the NMC chose to interpret this as them trying to "shift the blame".

    Don't get me wrong if these two qualified nurses ignore this patients needs then they should be deeply ashamed, and punished. But we know there were serious issues at Stafford stemming from the very top of the organisation but it's seems to be the Nurses who are carrying the can.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Ms Coulson and Ms King, who have both now retired from nursing,"

    What's the point of striking them if they are no longer nurses?
    Didn't Mid Staffs happen last year? Why does the NMC take so long to get anything done?
    I do feel the NMC should try and deal with all circumstances concerning the care given to the patient and know everything that was happening in the ward and the hospital at that time.

    What the nurses did was yucky but were they pushed into doing this? I am not a nurse and I do not work in the NHS so I may be saying something really silly next...
    What I mean is...
    We don't know how much pressure these nurses were under at the time. Its easy to condemn them now at our desks and our laptops...

    But if you were them, on this ward, would you have done the same thing?
    That's what's really frightening.

    Hospitals situation can change very quickly if new patients are coming in, and you know you have to check the patients notes but you really must do your rounds and check on this patient who is going home today and make sure she has all her painkillers and medicine. Then you have to deal with a handover and quickly get this new patient a bed and make sure its clean and comfortable....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is truly frightening for all nurses as we all know how bad staffing levels are in NHS hospitals. Too many managers on high salaries who do not listen when staff raise concerns as they are more interested in cutting budgets which generally means staff not being replaced when they leave and recruitment being frozen. I am aware of the need to save money but not at the cost of lives.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • she didn't have insulin for 48hrs - were these the only two nurses looking after her in a 48hr period?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ...."you are personally accountable for actions and omissions in your practice..."
    Not having insulin for 48 hours and dying as a consequence is a really serious omission, don't you think?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • PDave Angel | 21-Sep-2013 1:36 pm

    Hole in one! You might not be a nurse but you see the whole situation really clearly. I wish the NMC paid more attention to these details but they are in such a mess they can't think straight any more.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous 22 sept 3.17pm, I completely agree.

    The rest of you seem to think its ok to omit to such a severe degree that a patient dies just because the ward is busy or understaffed?? The whole of the NHS is busy and understaffed! I truly hope I NEVER end up in your care!

    It clearly says the medication was prescribed, why then, when the meds were being done did the insulin get missed for 48hours.

    The NMC is there to protect the patient, and under no circumstances is "the ward was busy" an excuse for such a disgraceful, repeated omissison that caused a woman to die.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 1020results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.