Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Mid Staffs nurses 'will not be named'


Doctors and nurses criticised during the public inquiry into disastrous standards of care at Stafford Hospital will not be named, it has been ruled.

Robert Francis QC, chairman of the inquiry, said it was “not the forum” for bringing frontline staff to account.

He said the focus of the investigation was to examine the operation of commissioning, supervisory and regulatory bodies and other agencies, in a bid to find out why problems at the hospital were not identified sooner.

Mr Francis said: “This inquiry is not the forum in which professionals responsible at the front line for such care can be brought to account.

“If I were to allow the identification of nurses and doctors and others who stand accused of providing poor care, they would stand accused in a public forum of serious complaints under the cloak of absolute privilege from defamation proceedings and be unable effectively to make a response.

“This is unfair to them, not helpful to the inquiry process and deflects from my central task.”

He added: “Fairness would, or might, require giving the individuals a right of response.

“It is, in my view, questionable whether such a right of response could properly be given in this inquiry.

“If it were not given, the individuals would have been accused in public of serious matters with no right of reply.

“I consider, therefore, there would be a real risk to their reputations and, where still employed by the trust, to the workings of the trust.”

Mr Francis said the anonymity order applied to those “involved directly with care of patients within the hospital” who were accused of substandard levels of care, but excluded “the directors of nursing, clinical directors, any member of the trust board or member of the foundation trust board of governors”.

Jeremy Hyam, counsel for campaign group Cure the NHS, had argued against the order.

He said: “The key issue is open justice and accountability. We say anonymity in such a case would be detrimental to the fulfilment of one of the main purposes of the inquiry.

“Names and faces in this context really matter.

“If no names and faces are given to those individuals there is a real risk that this inquiry will simply descend into a series of general observations made by various parties in relation to unknown and anonymous persons.”


Readers' comments (2)

  • Ronald Luton-Brown

    So the Managers get it in the neck for the appauling standards of care AND Nursing (yup with a capital N!) that was given by low grade nurses. Why do the perpertaures of this virtual blood bath get away with it? NAME and shame! They have brought MY Profession in to disripute!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • At the end of the day, the Management are responsible for ensuring that they have adequately resourced their personnel in terms of training and manpower. If at the inquiry it is found that there were adequate resources and that the poor standards were a result of direct negligence by frontline staff then it should be the case that they are not only named, but dealt with by the profession through the NMC.
    Lets wait for the presentation of evidence, the subsequent findings and then see the whole picture before deciding who is to blame.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.