Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Midlands trust loses £2m funding earmarked for additional nurses

  • 1 Comment

Royal Wolverhampton Foundation Trust will not receive £2m earmarked for additional nurses following the arbitration of a dispute with its clinical commissioning group.

The West Midlands trust entered into formal NHS England contract arbitration last month over a £4m dispute with Wolverhampton CCG over two unresolved areas of the trust’s contract for 2015-16.

The first dispute, valued at £2m, was over the CCG’s intention to withdraw recurrent funding for the provision of seven day working and supernumerary ward nurses.

The second disagreement, also valued at £2m, related to Wolverhampton CCG’s intention not to continue non-recurrent funding given to the trust in 2014-15 to pay for enhanced levels of nursing.

According to Royal Wolverhampton’s board papers for April, the extra nurses paid for by the funding were “required to meet the recommendations of the [Care Quality Commission] and the Francis report”.

A CQC inspection of the trust in September 2013 flagged concerns about low nursing numbers on some wards and urged it to increase staffing.

A spokeswoman for Wolverhampton CCG said that “following arbitration, a ruling has been made that allocates £2m to each organisation”.

She added: “We recognise that this is a challenging outcome and we will continue to work with The Royal Wolverhampton Trust to deliver the best possible health services for the people of Wolverhampton, within the resources that are available to us.”

The outcome leaves the trust with a £2m shortfall against its financial plan, which could affect its ability to maintain staffing levels.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • End the use of (private) agency nurses, work instead with a local Trust- run bank and save millions.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs