Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Nursing regulator to increase annual fee from March 2015


The nursing regulator has rubber-stamped plans to increase the annual registration fee from £100 to £120 at its latest council meeting today.

The Nursing and Midwifery Council has introduced the fee rise, despite an angry response to the plans from registrants. It argues that the 20% rise in the fee is necessary for its long-term financial stability and, therefore, its ability to protect patients.

“We are committed to keeping the fee at the lowest level which allows us to fulfil that statutory duty”

Mark Addison

At their latest meeting today, council members also discussed the alternative possibility of putting the fee up to £115, but in the end the majority voted in favour of £120.

In a statement announcing the move, NMC chair Mark Addison said: “Today we made the difficult decision to increase the annual registration fee for nurses and midwives to £120. 

“We have considered the responses to the consultation in detail and we have listened carefully to the issues raised,” he said. “We recognise the financial pressures that many nurses and midwives are facing at a time of widespread pay restraint, and the tough and demanding jobs they do.


Mark Addison

“However, as council members and trustees of the NMC, our first duty is to ensure the protection of the public. We are committed to keeping the fee at the lowest level which allows us to fulfil that statutory duty, and we will continue to search for more efficient ways of working,” added Mr Addison. 

“Currently, the only way for us to significantly to reduce our costs is to change the existing legislation, which requires us to take more cases to a hearing than is necessary,” he said. “We will continue to press vigorously for changes to our legal framework.”

A three-month consultation on the unpopular plans to up the fee closed on 31 July. The NMC’s council considered the outcome of the consultation at its meeting on 1 October and agreed to seek to introduce the fee rise from March 2015.

However, unions have condemned the potential fee rise, coming as it does against the background of a pay dispute with the government.

They have claimed that increasing the registration fee could damage efforts to retain highly skilled nursing staff to the NHS at a time when the service is facing a major staffing shortage.


Recent history of the NMC fee

March 2015 – fee increases from £100 to £120

February 2013 – fee increases from £76 to £100

August 2007 – fee increases from £43 to £76


The regulator first attempted to increase the annual registration fee to £120 in 2012. But following a one-off £20m government grant, the NMC instead upped the fee to £100 for two years in February 2013.

However, the NMC’s long-term financial strategy allowed for it to revisit an increase to £120 from March 2015, which it is currently doing less than two years after the last increase.

In February, the NMC warned that its financial situation would be “unsustainable” in future without a further rise in the annual registration fee.

Its financial strategy requires it to maintain available free reserves of between £10m and £25m to cope with changes in fitness to practice trends. In August, its reserves were £9.7m, meaning it was already in breach of its policy.

During the current 2014-15 financial year, the NMC expects £68m of its total £71m income to come from registration fee payments.

In their responses to the consultation, submitted in August, Unison and the Royal College of Nursing urged the NMC to find other ways to balance its books rather than passing on its funding problems to registrants. Unison called for it to review costly fitness to practise referrals to ensure they were appropriate, noting that only 0.6% of registrants ever had their fitness to practise questioned.

Meanwhile, a nurse-led petition calling on the government to review the process the NMC uses to decide its annual registration fee has so far been signed by over 105,000 people.

Portland Place

Nursing and Midwifery Council

The regulator has, however, moved to soften the blow by seeking to enable nurses and midwives to pay the annual registration fee in instalments.

Depending on the result of a consultation, which closes on 3 October, the NMC said it expects to have fully functioning system of paying registration fees in instalments in place from 2016.

Meanwhile, the regulator has also highlighted that most registered nursing staff are still failing to claim back the tax relief they are due on the annual fee.

The NMC said last week that 70% of nurses and midwives were not claiming tax relief on their annual registration fee.

Nurses and midwives are eligible to claim tax relief on the NMC annual registration fee, which is worth £20 per year at the current fee level of £100.


Readers' comments (70)

  • you just got to love the NMC, where else could pay so much fo so little and so much crap.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nice to know somebody is getting a 20% pay rise....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Disgusting.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • its ok you can use your 1% pay rise to fund the increase...oh sorry forgot!!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • An absolute disgraceful decision by the regulator. George Osborne made his intentions known this week on how he views public sector workers - a further pay freeze proposed from 2015-2017 should the tories be elected. That will amount to a below inflation pay-rise for 7 subsequent years. What if all nurses refuse to re-register ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • totally agree with above comment

    the tories are really the people of the NHS though ar'nt they....sorry what planet am I on!!

    ever since they came to power they have shown utter contempt for the NHS and its workers

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is an equivalent to less than 1h worked via agency. Is this 120 pounds really worth fighting for and dissolving energy on silly 'nurse-led petition'. Nurses are being struck off register for removing a call bell for 5(five!) minutes from an abusive and aggressive patient. That is something worth a good fight: a legislation to protect you from increasingly stupid policies.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Taking bets now for £150 by next Christmas.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So the NMC "Committee" (composed of who I wonder?) have agreed to raise the fees by £20! Good for them, I hope the increase helps sustain their salary increses for 2015? Oh, we won't know that will we; as their financial arrangements are about as transparent as a Mexican Gangbanger's front car windscreen! Oh and the consultation was, in essence as unseemingly democratic as the Agenda for Change one in 2004!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm not a nurse but seems ridiculous to me that nurses and midwives have to pay anything at all. Of course have them registered, keep training up to date and check this regularly but I thought we were trying to encourage people into these professions not put them off! Don't they work hard enough for very little financial reward as it is. When are politicians going to get their priorities right? Maybe I'm naive, probably am, but just doesn't make any sense to me.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.