Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

NMC performance improves but some targets still missed


The Nursing and Midwifery Council has improved its performance overall, but is still missing targets requiring it to maintain an accurate register and ensure registrants are continually fit to practise.

The Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care – which regulates nine professional bodies including the NMC – noted the nursing regulator’s progress in customer service, introducing online registration and concluding fitness to practise hearings more quickly.

“We have met several more standards than last year, which is a considerable achievement”

Jackie Smith

Introduction of the new code of conduct, its work with the General Medical Council in developing joint duty of candour guidance and its handling of concerns about midwifery practice in Guernsey in the past year, were also all praised in the PSA’s annual performance review for 2014-15.

However, the PSA found that despite ongoing preparation work for introducing revalidation, the NMC did not yet meet the standard for having a system to ensure its registrants were continually fit to practise.

It also noted that some if its “most significant” concerns around the proposed model for revalidation remained.

Failure to evaluate the risks assocoiated with different groups of registrants using the proposed “one size fits all” model was one concern noted by the PSA.

“Although the report highlights good progress, we know there is still plenty to do and we are not complacent about that”

Jackie Smith

Another was the lack of available information the NMC had provided about the costs and benefits of the proposed scheme, and the operational impacts on the regulator and third parties involved.

Concerns have already been raised by registrants that the cost of revalidation might be passed on to them via an increase in the annual registration fee.

“The NMC told us that the outcome of [its] initial assessment will be used to inform further work it has commissioned that will run alongside the revalidation pilots,” noted the PSA.

It added: “In our view, it might have been advantageous for the NMC to have undertaken that work at an earlier stage, so that it could have informed the pilots.”

Harry Cayton, chief executive of the PSA, said: “We are pleased to report that the regulators are generally protecting the public well. It is especially pleasing to see the overall improvement in the NMC’s performance since our strategic review over two years ago.” 

Jackie Smith

Jackie Smith

NMC chief executive and registrar Jackie Smith said: “I am delighted that the PSA’s annual performance review recognises the improvements we have made and the good practice we have demonstrated in 2014-15.

“We have met several more standards than last year, which is a considerable achievement,” she said.

“Although the report highlights good progress, we know there is still plenty to do and we are not complacent about that. Getting better in the interests of the public and the professions is our ambition which we are committed to,” she added.


Readers' comments (4)

  • Why on earth can't they get it right? How long have they been in existence? Pathetic.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So how much will the fees be next in order to pay for their incompetence?. I'm sure if we didn't hit targets regularly we'd be looking for a new job.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Read their monthly board reports - the NMC is afflicted with the same ponderous, painful bureaucracy as the rest of the NHS. Everything happens at glacial speed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Would it not be a good idea to have one regulator for all Healthcare Professionals - I believe one exists already and this could be a very good idea

    This is borne out by colleagues in other professions happier with their Regulator than most Nurses who I work with

    The fact that the HCPC has several or more different professional groups gives it diversity and from this real strength and consensus

    The NMC was foisted on Nurses and replaced the UKCC

    Such change was not asked for and has done worse than its predecessor

    Please nurses think about this!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.