Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

NMC pledges to monitor impact of fee rise on size of nursing workforce

  • 25 Comments

The Nursing and Midwifery Council has said it will monitor the impact of its decision to increase the annual registration fee from £100 to £120, which unions have warned could persuade tens of thousands of staff to leave the profession.

Speaking yesterday after the regulator approved the fee rise, NMC chief executive and registrar Jackie Smith said that the nursing regulator would keep track of its impact on the numbers of nursing staff “as best as we can”.

However, she added that the previous fee increase, which saw it rise from £76 to £100 in 2013, did not appear to have caused a reduction to the workforce.

Ms Smith said the NMC currently had around 680,000 registrants, more than it has ever had before.

“That would suggest that the 2012 increase didn’t result in a falling of numbers, but we cannot be complacent about this,” she said. “We need to monitor it [the impact of the fee increase to £120] and will do.”

Jackie Smith

Jackie Smith

However, Unison’s head of nursing Gail Adams warned that the new fees, which will be introduced from March 2015, could see tens of thousands of nurses choosing to leave the profession.

She said those aged 55 and over could potentially decide to retire, leaving a “massive shortfall” in nursing staff.

The NMC’s own consultation exercise on the fee rise, held earlier this year, appeared to support her concerns. Analysis of responses to consultation found 56% of nursing staff aged 55 and over said the increase would be likely to affect their decision to continue working.

The NMC currently has 132,000 registered nurses in this age group. Ms Adams warned that the majority of this group could decide to stop working.

Ms Adams told Nursing Times: “Registrants will be absolutely horrified by the NMC’s decision. I have a genuine concern about the impact this will have but in particular nurses and midwives who are 55 and over who could vote with their feet.”

“It does little to protect the public if you lose the nurse and midwives and health visitors who are looking after some of the most vulnerable in our society”

Gail Adams

Speaking during the NMC council meeting yesterday, she urged the regulator to monitor the impact of the fee increase on a more regular basis than its current annual review.

She added: “It does little to protect the public if you lose the nurse and midwives and health visitors who are looking after some of the most vulnerable in our society.”

Howard Catton, head of policy at the Royal College of Nursing, said the registration fee increase – against the backdrop of pay freezes, the introduction of revalidation next year and work pressures – presented a “significant” and “potentially quite immediate” risk to the size of the nursing workforce.

Howard Catton

He said: “This isn’t an issue solely about the NMC and regulation – the implications and consequences are wider than that and potentially quite immediate.”

Mr Catton also warned that if nurses decided to quit or retire earlier than planned, this would add to the pressure for those remaining at time when there is already a shortage of workers.

Asked by Nursing Times if the NMC had a contingency plan for the potential loss of nurses and midwives from the workforce,  Ms Smith said: “If we had a 10 or 20% fall off the register then we would have to understand the financial implications and where  it leads us, so that is the contingency. That is why it’s really important to monitor this closely.”

Ms Smith added that the regulator had committed to looking at the possibility of reducing the annual registration fees in the future, if it met its financial targets.

“Something we need to come back to at a later date is whether we can bring the fee down. But it is predicated on the essential changes that we need in fitness to practise legislation,” she said.

NMC chair Mark Addison confirmed that the council had also committed to looking at setting the annual registration fee in future years according to a nurse or midwife’s pay band.

He said: “We have said we will look sympathetically – but don’t want to make any commitments – about the fee in relation to different salary levels.”

 

Recent history of the NMC fee

March 2015 – fee increases from £100 to £120

February 2013 – fee increases from £76 to £100

August 2007 – fee increases from £43 to £76

  • 25 Comments

Readers' comments (25)

  • I teach on Access courses in FE, specifically the health pathway for prospective nurse/midwifery undergraduates. It will be interesting to see what happens when I advise my students of this change. Some of them hadn't anticipated an annual fee let alone a rise and are already reconsidering their desired career path. Watch this space as it were.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The Unions have been stupid and now their bluff is being called. There will not be one resignation from the Register purely on the basis of the cost of registration. Who in their right mind is going to leave a job with a starting salary of £20kpa+ over an extra £20?

    With the inevitable evidence that a 20% hike has virtually no impact on the rate of attrition of the N&M workforce, the NMC will effectively have evidence that the profession at large is giving tacit approval or acceptance of rate increases.


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NHS is not a business

    It will not put people off becoming a qualified nurse but it is another straw on the back of staff who are giving their all and seeing nothing in return. The majority of hard working people only ever see or hear of the NMC when it comes to something going wrong - they are paying annually to an organisation that they see as being the ones who can end their careers, not prolong them.

    From £76 to £120 in three years, come on! 670000 staff on the register at £120 a year. The figures are incredible and unjustifiable.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I would like to know what exactly is being done with the fees I pay every year! As a single mother of two and working full time, this is a financial strain on my family to pay in one go. The fact this increase has just been announced, with no discussion of the fees possibly going up before hand is disgusting!! And as nurses, we will willingly be shafted once again!! It really is sickening!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The fees are just another tax. How much of the money raised actually goes to NMC?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Another straw indeed, there is a thatched reef on the backs of most modern Nurses. I qualified in 1981 the GNC fee for a life time registration was £31, RCN monthly payments£2.21 and wages take home pay £250/ month for 37 1/2 hrs!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Or roof....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Aren't they supposed to monitor things anyway - why is it such a headline that they say they are doing this?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The NMC are raising an extra £4,400,000.00 off our backs. The NMC don't care whether nursing numbers fall as a result: it probably fits into their advanced-HCA agenda. Who'dve though the one body that is su poised to represent nursing being responsible for its downfall!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hey, don't get too downhearted, the chief exec will get a smashing performance pay rise...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.