Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

NMC proposes 60% hike in registration fee


The Nursing and Midwifery Council has proposed increasing the annual registrants’ fee to £120 from the start of next year.

This would mean an increase of £44 on the current fee of £76, which has not risen since 2007.

The NMC council approved the proposed increase at its monthly meeting this morning, together with increases in line with inflation in future years.

The nursing regulator says the big increase is needed to finance the level of activity required to deliver its core fitness to practise functions.

Interim chief executive Jackie Smith told the council that the current fees generated around £51m a year of the regulator’s total income of £52m.

However, she warned that the NMC would need £73m this year to maintain the present level of FtP activity and that the regulator was “eating into” its financial reserves.

“What we’ve seen is an unprecedented increase in FtP activity,” she said.

The regulator current has a caseload of 4,461, up from 4,342 in March. It has also seen a 52% increase in referrals over the past two years while it continues to struggle with clearing a backlog of historic cases. 

Without a fee rise, Ms Smith said the NMC would have to “immediately cut back its FtP activity”. The number of hearings would have to be reduced from 15 hearings per day to eight, which would result in 460 fewer a year. Ms Smith said this was not an option.

NMC interim chair Judith Ellis warned that the regulator’s financial position was “fundamentally unsustainable” without the fee increase. She added: “We have to be able to protect the public.”

The NMC said it planned to begin a consultation on the proposed fee increase next month.

Council was told that the regulator had discussed the move with health minister Anne Milton last Thursday. The Department of Health “know the facts of it,” said Professor Ellis.

Council member Ruth Sawtell said: “This is such a desperately worrying situation.”

“We are caught between a rock and a hard place.”

The regulator had discussed three fee level options: an increase of £100, and increase of £120 or an increase of £140.

The council notes said the lowest increase would “not sustain the FtP activity which is currently foreseen”, and was not discussed by members.

The £120 figure, which was recommended to the council and approved, would enable the NMC to deliver FtP and other regulatory activity at “safe levels”, the papers said.

Council member David Pyle also suggested that the fee increase in line with inflation in future years, to avoid a similar situation occurring again. This was also approved by council to be taken forward to the consultation.

Some council members favoured a fee rise of £140, which the papers said would “future proof” the regulator against unexpected hikes in referrals.

The NMC is predicting a further increase in activity following the publication of the Francis report into Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust, which is due in the autumn.

Council member Grahame Owen said: “It is important to ask how much ‘headroom’ have we got with £120? It’s limited.”

But fellow member Carole Rees-Williams noted that any fee rise “might be difficult” for “nurses at the coalface” in the current economic climate.

Unison has told Nursing Times that it would be opposing any increase in the registration fee.

The union’s head of nursing, Gail Adams, said: “Hard pressed nurses and midwifes will rightly be very angry about plans to make them pay more to work.

“Many of these vital health workers and their families are already struggling to make ends meet. Not only have they had their pay frozen for two years, with two more years of pay austerity on the horizon, they are also having to pay more for their pensions.”

Royal College of Nursing chief executive and general secretary Peter Carter said: “This is a staggering proposal at a time when nurses are under huge financial pressure.

“Indeed, it is deeply unfair that the NMC would propose a near 60% hike in fees when nurses are in the middle of a two year pay freeze and facing increased pensions contributions. We know that the NMC is facing financial challenges, but nurses should not be picking up the tab.”

Both unions said they would be seeking an urgent meeting with the NMC on the issue.

Cathy Warwick, chief executive of the Royal College of Midwives, added: “I understand that high quality regulation of midwives and nurses comes at a price. However, the focus should not be on a fee rise but on the Government supporting the NMC to get its house in order, and to support it in dealing with the challenge of its fitness to practice caseload.

“Midwives should not face an increase and be the ones to pay the price for the current difficulties facing the NMC.”


Readers' comments (124)

  • The NMC council approved the proposed increase at its monthly meeting this morning, together with increases in line with inflation in future years.

    Does this mean that the NMC are also going to look at the fact that we still have pay freezes across the board, and little chance of getting a pay rise? We don't get to have an increase in line with inflation so why should they?

    They actually want us to pay for their incompetence then do not take into account the real life situations of payments to nurses under their umbrella (I would say care but it isn't really a laughing matter).

    Will they actually be able to deliver if we pay the increases?

    I doubt it

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • looks like they need to balance their books and get their house in order first.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Maybe if our fellow nurses werent so imcompetent and abided by the NMC's code and did their jobs properly then there would be less FtP referrals and we would not be having this increase

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • At one time we had the GNC and JBCNS then the UKCC and the ENB one for registration issues the other for Education and things worked well. Then we got the NMC and the two were thrown together, the outcome as we can see has been disasterous for the nursing profession. To compound the problems we have had massive swathes of recruitment from overseas and nurses put onto the register after attending 'ad hoc' adaptation programmes that were not sufficiently regulated by the NMC. It is very interesting to look at the number of cases involving nurses recruited from overseas and hastely admitted to the register in order to fill the gaps in hospitals and care homes.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well I will not be recommending Nursing as a profession, for the following reasons:
    You have to pay to go to work, Which increases with inflation when your pay doesn't.
    when you are there the staffing levels are poor.
    the pension is poor due to resent changes
    you are expected to complete paperwork rather than touch a patient that's what the HCA'S do.
    Pay freeze for another 2 yrs ? longer.

    No wonder more experienced nurses are leaving, even junior nurses are leaving due to working conditions

    The NHS is a sinking ship.

    Thought the MNC was there to support nurses in their career, instead they are just money grabbing, if they did their job in the first place when people registered for the first time then there would not be all the FtP that we have to fund.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If the NMC are not actually there to protect the Nurses or support them or do any good for the Nursing professionals, why do the Nurses have to pay extra? The Government should be subsidising (although they would probably use our pension pot to do it!)
    Surely by moving the NMC from the grand building in Central London to cheaper premises would pay for the extra FtP hearings and using cheaper accomodation rather than the 4* hotels for witnesses.
    Simple financial contraints would solve this issues I feel.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sorry that should be 'these' issues

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Its a Joke So is the NMC....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why do hard working nurses have to pay for the mistakes of others including the NMC?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Some would say this is the necessary cost of professionalism. Some may question why there is a increasing number of FtP referalls. Before hitting the empty pockets of the members of the profession, shouldn't the NMC be investigating why there are so many cases - this is a regulatory failure isn't it? Is the same pattern occuring at the HPC?

    I sincerely hope that the Unions and the RCN reject this appalling proposal.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs