Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

NMC to decide whether to rubber-stamp revalidation plans

  • 6 Comments

A major new system of competency checks for nurses is expected to be approved for launch in April, as the Nursing and Midwifery Council meets today to finalise its plans on revalidation.

The NMC council will be asked to agree to changes to its original plans for the three-yearly revalidation system, following feedback from employers, including organisations that have piloted the new process.

“We have always said the whole purpose of piloting revalidation was to listen to feedback”

Jackie Smith

Changes will include a possible reduction to the number of continuing professional development hours required for completing revalidation, which will replace post-registration education and practice (PREP).

Draft guidance released at the start of the year stipulated registrants would have to complete a minimum of 40 hours of CPD in the three years prior to registration renewal.

But the NMC council will now be recommended to cut it to 35 hours, bringing it into line with the current PREP system.

Independent analysis of the pilots and other organisations’ preparation suggested the highest one-off cost for revalidation was expected to be from providing CPD support. However, the NMC said organisations had questioned the evidence supporting an extra 40 hours.

NMC chief executive and registrar Jackie Smith told Nursing Times: “That’s a fair challenge. We have always said the whole purpose of piloting revalidation was to listen to feedback.”

The revised draft guidance for revalidation, released last week, confirmed registrants will still have to complete at least 450 hours of practice, compile five pieces of practice-related feedback and prepare five written reflective accounts relating to the code of conduct.

A reflective discussion with another registrant is also required, as is a health and character declaration and evidence of indemnity insurance. In addition, registrants must have all of the revalidation requirements “confirmed” and signed off by a third party, who is preferably their line manager but does not have to be an NMC registrant.

The updated draft guidance includes additional information on the verification of portfolios by the NMC and how nurses awaiting fitness to practise procedures will still be able to revalidate.

Nursing and Midwifery Council

The NMC’s HQ in Portland Place

Evaluation of the pilot sites found some organisations had noted that under PREP a “very limited” number of portfolios were requested by the NMC for review.

They called for a “more visible and extensive” process for checking revalidation portfolios to avoid it becoming a “tick box exercise”.

NMC council papers confirmed registrants would be selected “at random” for verification, but taking into account those nurses and midwives who were more “at risk”, which it defined as people who do not have an NMC registrant line manager or those who do not have a regular appraisal.

Other findings from the evaluation included that 6% of registrants at the pilot sites failed to complete revalidation.

A survey found most were unable to finish the process because they did not have all of the required evidence. Others cited a lack of time, but the NMC said registrants would normally have three years to meet the requirements.

Meanwhile, the NMC has proposed new standards for readmission to the register to stop people from taking advantage of a loophole that enabled them to dodge revalidation by re-joining the register within six months of their registration expiring.

In papers to be discussed on 8 October, the regulator said the rule would “deter any registrants from seeking to avoid the revalidation requirements by lapsing their registration and then immediately seeking readmission”.

  • Nursing Times will report the outcome of the NMC’s discussion later today and responses to it. Follow @nic_merrifield on Twitter throughout the morning for live updates from the council meeting.
  • 6 Comments

Readers' comments (6)

  • How will this work for nurses practising overseas that still want to keep there uk registration?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just send them the documentation in the language of the country you are working in and let them sort it out or pay for the translators. The NHS should be able to oblige there. The problem is retuning to the uk and trying to get an NHS job!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dither dither that's the NMC! Bloody useless.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Has anyone thought about how the NMC are going to manage the checking or audit of evidence bearing in mind how much of a huff and puff there is around fitness to practice hearings - coupled to the fact that only a miniscule percentage of PREP folders are called in - if any?

    So lets assume that they are going to recruit a small army in Central London to administer this - where is the funding for this coming from? Should we start a sweepstake now about how much the next registration fee will increase?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Do the NMC work in their own time to prove they are fit to manage us? If not why should we? Ten written pieces of work equates to a minimum of ten hours plus all the wasted money on administration. PREP started with a flourish then ground to a halt and didn't work and this will fall by the wayside in a short time too I'm sure as managers realise the extra work required by all concerned.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Can I have a refund for the ENB portfolio file I purchased for PREP? Think I will chuck it out as it is no longer up to date and takes up too much room that I need for other files concerned with my household administration, hobbies, etc.

    At the same time you can reimburse my GNC fees which promised SRN registration for life.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.