Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

NMC to vote on proposals for nurse revalidation


Nurses and midwives may have to collect positive feedback from patients and colleagues every three years in order to remain on the register, under proposals for the revalidation of the profession.

The options put forward by the Nursing and Midwifery Council yesterday also suggest nurses and midwives could be signed off as fit to practise by an individual who is not a registrant.

The regulator committed itself to roll out revalidation by the end of 2015 in the wake of the Francis report into care failings at Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust. The report, published in February, said revalidation would be “highly desirable”.

At a meeting next week, NMC council members are due to debate a range of options that include continuing with the current post-registration education and practice (PREP) system as it is or introducing more checks.

However, papers published yesterday show the favoured option is for the PREP system to be enhanced through the addition of “third party feedback”.

Registrants would then have to get confirmation from another “third party” that they were fit to practise, most likely the manager responsible for their appraisal. Under the current plans there is no requirement for this individual to be a registrant.

The document says the “confirmation model” needs to be “flexible” to take into account the variety of different settings nurses work in. For example, a nurse working in a care home may be the only registrant employed by that organisation.

Once they have got sign off, the nurse or midwife will then self-declare their fitness to practise – similar to how they would under the current PREP system.

A spokeswoman for the regulator said self-declaration was currently the only option because the NMC did not have the legal powers to compel non-registrants to provide them with information.

The NMC has been criticised for rarely auditing the documentation collected by nurses for their PREP and chief executive Jackie Smith admitted the system was not fit for purpose last year.

It is proposed that under revalidation annual audits would be completed with a sample picked partly at random and partly based on the NMC’s analysis of where there was a risk that procedure was not being followed.

Unison head of Nursing Gail Adams told Nursing Times anything would be better than the current system, as long as it was proportionate and did not lead to an increase in the registration fee.

She said: “We need a system in place for 2015 but it doesn’t need to be all singing, all dancing. We need something that can be tested and enhanced in future if needs be.”

Royal College of Nursing head of policy Howard Catton told Nursing Times that the RCN supported revalidation as a way of improving “public safety and public confidence”.

Meanwhile, Royal College of Midwives chief executive Cathy Warwick said in a statement that she supported the proposals but any method of revalidation “must be proportionate and cost effective”.

“The NHS and NMC will have to invest heavily in managerial skills and protected time for midwives if this new system is to work,” she said. “The RCM wants to see appraisal, which is part of midwives’ UK wide terms and conditions, work, but if this is to be the basis of revalidation it will need to be delivered uniformly across the NHS.”

She said: “The proposals appear to suggest a three yearly enhanced form of appraisal, but the issue is that currently a significant proportion of midwives do not get an appraisal and of those that do a large number do not find it useful.”

However, she added: “We look forward to working with the NMC to move these proposals forward.”

Unions will be consulting with their members on the proposals.

All of the options put forward for introduction by 2015 are possible within existing legislation that governs the NMC.

However, at next Thursday’s meeting council members will also be asked for their views on more radical options for the future.

These include the model adopted by the medical profession last year, where every doctor is appraised by a designated responsible officer who is also on the General Medical Council register. Adopting this system would be likely to almost triple the NMC’s costs.

Other options include rolling out the supervisory model currently used in midwifery, which requires all midwives to have an allocated supervisor, or a series of more minor moderations – for example reducing the frequency nurses have to renew their registration or changing the practice hours nurses must complete.

Under this option, council will also consider whether revalidation should be limited to nurses and midwives delivering direct patient care.

Once the NMC council has chosen its preferred option, the regulator will then hold an external consultation on the proposals.

Are you able to Speak Out Safely? Sign our petition to put pressure on your trust to support an open and transparent NHS.



We will be hosting a twitter debate on these proposals at 3.30pm on Friday 6 September.

To join in, search for #NTtwitchat at use this hastag in your tweets.


Readers' comments (48)

  • This proposal is very worrying.
    How can we expect a non-registered third party to understand the complexities of modern day nursing.
    Gone are the days when nursing was mainly practical and task orientated. Modern nurses are educated to degree level, with many opting to undertake masters and PhD's. They are autonomous practitioners providing a highly skilled service, using extended skills, and often practicing independently in nurse led clinics.
    They are also responsible for the management and delegation of junior members of staff, and for their own personal and professional development.
    Others may disagree, but I really don't think that we can expect a lay person to be able to understand the multi-faceted role of the nurse, and confidently allow these individuals to make or break a nurse's career.
    I am fully in favour of tighter checks, as long as this does not incur further charges. The NMC has a responsibility to it's members in the current economical climate, where pay increases have been restricted and agenda for change is again under review, to keep registration fee increases to a minimum.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • maybe nurses need more clarity on what exactly their fees cover. everybody knows they are first and foremost to have their professional qualifications entered and maintained on the register and kept up to date in order to licence them to practice legally in the UK but are they all fully aware of exactly what other services, if any, are available to them and included in their annual fees?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 9-Sep-2013 11:26 am

    I agree with you. revalidation should not be confounded with patient feedback on the level of services they receive from the NHS during a period of clinical investigations and treatment in outpatients, GP practice or during hospitalisation.

    both types of feedback are important but for entirely different purposes. obviously the latter should be more general in nature and patients should reserve the right to single out nurses who they feel have provided outstanding service or to complain about poor practice.

    the former should be an evaluation of professional performance which can be best judged by co-workers at all levels.

    it seems that nursing is perceived by many lay people, including the many non-clinicians attempting to manage it, as a task oriented job whose skills can be learned by anybody rather than a profession incorporating an extremely vast palette of skills learned over several years of training and further developed and perfected through many more years of practice and experience.

    It seems that nursing is rapidly becoming de-professionalised by the many organisations which should be supporting the profession and through good and intelligent resourcing and flexibility and by helping it and its members to further develop not only to meet the rapidly changing and increasing needs and demands of today and the foreseeable future and well beyond where it is less predictable.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This gets on my nerves its no wonder nurses are leaving the profession in droves with all cuts, legislation and now revalidation, for goodness sake. I only qualified seven years ago and although I love my job, I have always maintained my PREP folder even now and why has nobody but my senior staff looked at it at my appraisal. When I first qualified I was told that the NMC pick so many at random to see but I havent heard of one of the the nurses folders being seen were I work.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Where to start with this one? Em, I hope everyone noted that those knackers at the RCN agree with the proposal - that says it all for me, really!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NMC is unable to cope with what it has to do already so little confidence that this will ever be achieved!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Monica Dennis | 12-Sep-2013 11:26 am

    it doesn't seem that it is perceived by many as an achievement!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think the NMC should be dissolved. How could it possibly cost 90 million a year to run a register when we dont even get a pincard any more ?
    Paper work , paperwork and more paperwork.
    One can be struck off on a whim....scary.
    I wouldnt recommend the role of a nurse to anyone.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.