Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Osborne reveals NHS pay restraint bombshell

  • 56 Comments

Nurses working in the NHS will continue to see their pay restrained, with annual salary rises restricted to 1% over the next four years, Chancellor George Osborne has said today as he laid out the new government’s financial plans.

However, he also announced the national minimum wage for people over the age of 25 will increase – creating a “national living wage” – to £7.20 an hour in 2016, and then £9 by 2020.

In his first budget announcement since the Conservative government won the election, Mr Osborne said there was a “simple trade-off” between pay and jobs in many public services.

“I know there has already been a period of pay restraint. But we said last autumn there we would need to find commensurate savings in this parliament,” he said.

“So, to ensure we have public services we can afford and to protect more jobs, we will continue recent public sector pay awards with a rise of 1% per year for the next four years,” said Mr Osborne.

The chancellor said the NHS was the government’s “priority” and went on to reiterate the Conservative commitment to provide it with an additional £8bn a year by 2020, in line with the Five-Year Forward View, the five-year plan set out last autumn by NHS England boss Simon Stevens.

Mr Osborne said this was on top of the extra £2bn already promised for the NHS budget this year, which would amount to an additional £10bn a year by 2020.

However, he noted that the NHS itself would have to make “very challenging” efficiency savings over the coming years.

“Public spending should reflect public priorities and we have to make choices. Our priority is the national health service,” he said.

In its full budget document published today, the government states average levels of public and private sector pay are the same, but that public sector workers “continue to benefit from a significant premium once employer pension contributions are taken into account”.

“George Osborne’s announcement might look attractive at first glance, but he’s simply giving to the low-paid with one hand and taking away with the other”

Dave Prentis

It says restricting pay to 1% a year from 2016-17 onwards will save the government around £5bn by 2019-20.

The document also reveals there will be a “renewed focus” on reforming progression pay and other terms and conditions for public sector workers.

Meanwhile, it explains that workers over the age of 25 will be paid a premium on top of the national minimum wage to ensure they earn what Mr Osborne is calling a “national living wage” of at least £7.20 an hour from April 2016.

However, the Living Wage Foundation – an independent charity which calculates annual minimum rates of pay – sets the current UK living wage at £7.85 an hour, and £9.15 an hour for those living in London.

Unison described the 1% pay award as “miserly” and said the announcement would “hasten the reluctant exit of many dedicated staff from our hospitals, schools and local councils”.

The union’s general secretary Dave Prentis said: “The economy is growing yet public servants remain shut out of the recovery.

“Britain won’t have public services fit for 21st century needs, unless wages for public servants are high enough to attract the best recruits. Pay austerity might be over for MPs but it’s set to continue for many more years for everyone else in the public sector.”

He added “An hourly rate of £7.20 is not a living wage. George Osborne’s announcement might look attractive at first glance but as tax credits are cruelly snatched away – leaving many workers £1,200 worse off – he’s simply giving to the low-paid with one hand and taking away with the other.”

The Royal College of Nursing echoed concerns about the “shock” announcement to limit pay rises to 1% for nurses and other public sector workers.

It warned of “serious consequences” for nurses and patients, pointing to the ongoing struggle being experienced by the NHS in recruiting nurses.

“Nurses are already feeling the effect of what will now be a decade of severe pay restraint”

Peter Carter

Peter Carter, chief executive and general secretary of the RCN, said: “Nurses are working harder than ever under greater pressure as demand for their care is growing.

“That demand is only going to increase over the years to come,” he said. “Nurses are already feeling the effect of what will now be a decade of severe pay restraint and subsequent reduced living standards.”

He added: “This decision will make the situation worse as nurses realise they are not valued – the shock of this announcement will be felt by many.

“There is an independent NHS Pay Review Body that makes recommendations about NHS pay awards – until the chancellor spoke today, nursing staff were totally unaware that this was disappearing.”

 

 

  • 56 Comments

Readers' comments (56)

  • I am now officially loooking to leave the NHS. This worm is turning....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Pay restraint:no surprise there then....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The country is broke, public services are broke, the NHS is broke - Surely a 1% rise, in the circumstances that we are in, within an establishment that has no doubt trained and supported you is not that bad? Don't fall into the trap of demonising nurses and the NHS - Suck it up and carry one - We are committed to caring and if anyone came into it for the money then they were sadly mistaken.
    Hold your heads up high, we do a fantastic job, most people would love to give us all a massive pay rise............... but.......... no one wants to see services shut or jobs lost nit just in the NHS but the wider public sector too

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • MP's 11% Nurses 1%
    5 months and I'm out. Never envisaged ending my career like this.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Off to do agency work then as no insentive to stay in the NHS.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Deeply offended by the chancellor and the complete and utter disdain that he has shown towards the NHS and the nurses. We are paying for the mistakes made by other proffesionals in other industries and the complete and utter incompentence of this and the last government.
    I am especially sick at the chancellor only a few weeks ago talking of how well the economy is doing and that most wages are rising now above the rate of inflation. PLEASE STIKE..........
    PLEASE PLEASE STRIKE.....
    I am very caring like the majority of nurses but I have to make a decent living wage....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • watch the nurses leave in their hundreds .....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Knowing many friends who have left the NHS to work agency and then in the private sector a lot of them have regretted it and looked to return to the NHS.

    The grass isn't always greener and it has always been the case that not one of us ever became a nurse to get rich.

    If anyone is looking for a bit of perspective on the list of 100 average wages in the UK, Midwives come 30th and Nurses 38th. http://www.icalculator.info/news/UK_average_earnings_2014.html

    We might be badly treated, but there are a lot of people earning a lot less.

    For the record I am not, and never will be, a Tory supporter.



    I

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just don't forget the conditions of service. I know people moan about the pay but not many other employers offer such good holidays, who give time off in lieu in addition to Bank Holiday pay, and there are very few indeed who would be so generous with their attitude towards sickness (even when they know very well that some staff take advantage of this) and who offer reasonable job security and paid time off to do the continuing training that we are required to do. I know successive governments sideline us because they can, and because a lot of nurses are conscientious enough never to consider strike action. I would like more money too, wouldn't we all, but I recognise that the pay is not the ONLY reason I work for the NHS. I've worked in the private sector, too, and the support just isn't there.

    I think I had better remain anonymous because I don't like it when people shout at me...........

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • But what the heck, if I've got something to say I should just say it!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.