Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Rotations for newly-qualifieds rejected

  • 1 Comment

A call for rotational posts to be made compulsory for newly-qualified nurses has been rejected in a vote at the Royal College of Nursing’s annual conference.

The RCN’s Devon branch put forward the idea that making it compulsory for rotations during the first year aft qualification could ensure “maximum learning and development opportunities and equip staff nurses to care for a range of patients in different clinical settings”.

“It can be difficult for newly-registered nurses to be sure which area of nursing they want to develop a career in. Rotational programmes can help them to make up their mind, ultimately leading to improved retention for organisations,” it stated in support of the resolution.

It also noted that it was already well-established practice in medicine and was “gaining popularity” in nursing.

Simon Clarke, who second the motion, said: “Being at work as a nurse is very different to being a student on a placement… really often newly qualified nurses are thrown in at the deep end.”

Cat Forthsyth, from the RCN’s safety representatives committee, also called on congress to “embrace” idea of compulsory rotational posts for first years.

But Anthony McGeown, a student from Greater Glasgow, argued against. He said: “We need to be very cautious I do not believe the compulsory road is the best route to take. I believe the college should be focusing more on the uptake of effective formal preceptorships for newly-qualified nurses.”

Former RCN president Maura Buchanan also spoke against the resolution as did several other delegates.

How can new nurses “settle” in an clinical area and gain the skills if being rotated every three months, asked Nykoma Hamilton from the Fife branch.

The resolution lost by a large majority, with 87.49% of delegates voting against it and only 16.51% voting in favour.

 

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • What a shame. The alternative proposal suggested by Government is for proposed nursing students to do a year as a healthcare assistant. Surely better to have an equivalent of an FY1 year after qualifying? If someone is qualified then they should be recognised as qualified but have a probationary period. I trained for 3 years full time. Now there are the University semesters. Far more holiday/ study time. So, it follows that it should perhaps be a four year course to make up for the learning previously done all year round under the pre University training. If the university course could be more of a mix of hands on and academic work but done in a systematic way, learning about an area that you will be going to, (e.g medicine, surgery, community), then the training will become more relevant and satisfactory for both the students and future employers.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs