Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Staffing agencies cash in on NHS nursing shifts over bank holiday


NHS hospitals across the country paid more than £1,000 for agency nurses and locum doctors to fill shifts on a public holiday, new figures show.

One Bristol hospital paid £1,800 for a nurse on the May Day Bank Holiday, while another in Morecambe parted with £2,500 for a locum doctor to work the same day.

The figures, obtained by Sky News through a Freedom of Information request, also show how half of the doctors working at a West Midlands hospital on 5 May this year were locums.

“This is something that should be looked at with the utmost urgency”

Peter Carter

Peter Carter, chief executive of the Royal College of Nursing, said: “These figures are truly shocking.

“Agency nurses do not provide good value for money and the employers who use these extraordinary levels should be held to account for it,” he told the broadcaster.

“This is public money that is not being well spent,” he said. “This is something that should be looked at with the utmost urgency.”

Eighty of the 150 NHS trusts in England responded to the request, which asked how many agency staff they employed and the highest rates paid on the first May Bank Holiday.

University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay Foundation Trust paid an agency £2,500 for a locum doctor to work single shift, while four others paid more than £1,100.

Meanwhile, University Hospitals Bristol Foundation Trust paid £1,800 for a nurse on a shift of just over 12 hours, working out at around £150 an hour, as four other trust’s spent more than £1,200.

Half of the doctors working at The Heart of England Trust, in the West Midlands, on 5 May were locums, and in three others, including Shrewsbury and Telford Trust, almost one in three nurses were from agencies.

A Department of Health spokesman said: “We now have 6,700 more doctors and 6,200 more nurses directly employed by NHS organisations than in 2010.

“The figures are not a full picture of staffing in the NHS, but we encourage all trusts to maintain a tight grip on their staff costs and we will hold poor performers to account.”

Nurse and National Health Action Party spokeswoman Kathryn Anderson, who has worked agency shifts, blamed the government.

Kathryn AndersonKathryn Anderson

She said: “The outrageous amounts paid for agency staff is just a symptom of a situation created by this government through its cuts to NHS staff and funding. 

​But she added: “​From first hand experience, I know that hospitals do not use agency staff lightly – senior ward staff need to jump through hoops before an agency nurse is allowed.

​”​It should also be remembered that the amounts quoted are the amounts the hospital pays the agency, not what the nurse receives,” she said.

Ms Anderson suggested the government should consider a cap on the hourly amount an NHS hospital will pay an agency for both nursing and medical personnel.



Readers' comments (23)

  • the chief exec and finance director should be could not make this up!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The only way nurses are able to make decent money at the moment is by doing overtime with a private agency! I think the whole pay situation is ridiculous for nurses, not even entitled to a 1% pay rise? I'm a student nurse and I am considering working at these agencies alongside my NHS job. In real terms nurses have taken a HUGE pay cut. It's not our fault the government and NHS spend their budgets irresponsibly. The NHS need to start appreciating their staff before they're all lost to the private sector. A lot of the nurses on my placement's didn't even get breaks on a 12.5 hour shift. The working conditions are atrocious. Something needs to be done, before it's too late.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This headline is misleading. The nurse was NOT paid £1800 for the shift. The NHS was CHARGED £1800 for the shift. Rather a large difference!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Being at the wrong end of austerity measures is tougher on the lower end of payscale.
    How many nurses are putting in unpaid overtime? and for those that do Bank shifts, above contracted hours, are not on overtime rates - it's just more regular rates. No wonder why staff turn to agencies to get more money, as we've got to make ends meet.
    Scrapping agency + bank, then lack of staff would be even more apparent and patients care more affected.

    Quoting from finance sector 'if we want high quality staff, they've got to be paid for and have decent level of remuneration'

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Private companies will always be waiting in the wings when a hospital cannot manage a good nurse bank and don't treat their staff well. I call that poor staffing management.
    The agency nurses will always be welcome when there is no one for the patients and thank goodness for them, as we have managers in the NHS, I often wonder how they got their job.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • to attract the best you need to pay the best, no complaints about paying bankers, once again the media exaggerates, no nurse would get that amount, no mention of locum managers, or other health care professionals, no mention of all the unpaid hours nurses do the tax payer more than than the taxpayer notices, no mention of the fact the average nurse wage isn't even an average wage, good luck to the talented nurses who can get paid properly, I don't begrudge them any of it

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 'good value for money' or 'safe staffing levels'

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How can it be justifiable to pay the private sector more for 1 shift than that which many nurses and midwives don't even take home for a month, this is scandalous. Myself and my colleagues Are currently £200 to £300 a month worse off than we were 3 years ago due to changes in terms and conditions and this along with the disgusting 1% non consolidated award demonstrates the low regard that the current govt holds for NHS professionals . Even when NHS staff do extra shifts on the bank they are often only paid at minimal levels often at a lower grade than that which they are employed in their main employment...... Yet we do it and regularly to ensure that care is not compromised. It would be interesting to see how much the nurse actually got in the pay packet and what percentage went to the agency, maybe a freedom of information request should be made in this instance

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Kathryn Anderson | 31-Jul-2014 5:36 pm

    Exactly, and headlines in the press are misleading the public. Another ploy, I guess, to put a nail in the coffin of nurses pay.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think it's a 50/50 split, so it's still pretty good money for the nurse. I'd do agency work myself but I can't be bothered with all the admin and hassle (and I'd have to go and do training in my own time because agencies like to see that you are up to their individual standards). I do occasional overtime at overtime rates - I did a bank holiday this year which meant I was working alongside one of the regular staff but getting paid more, even though I was less use because I wasn't regular staff - which doesn't seem fair, does it?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.