Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Trust hires extra nursing staff to climb out of financial black hole

  • 1 Comment

A hospital in financial difficulties has invested £3.2m in nursing to turn its fortunes around.

Barking, Havering and Redbridge Hospitals Trust had overspent by £18.2m by the end of September.

Documents obtained by Nursing Times’ sister magazine Health Service Journal show the trust was given the £3.2m earlier this year by the strategic health authority.

The trust has spent the cash on employing 32 extra nurses and 31 healthcare assistants, as well as on additional therapists to run two acute elderly units.

It hopes the new units will take the pressure off other wards and eventually allow it to close seven of them to save money.

The trust estimated that, up to the end of September, it had admitted 71,400 more patients than expected. It had also struggled with a high rate of delayed transfers of care, which particularly affects older patients.

A spokeswoman for the trust said: “The extra nursing staff are to act as ‘pump primers’, to produce a step change in the quality of care, help patients recover to return home more quickly and, through this, free resources tied up with agency staff and wards that would not be needed.”

The trust said that, since the new units had opened, the average length of stay for older patients had reduced by two days, the number of falls in hospital had halved and pressure ulcer rates had decreased by 30 per cent.

So far, the trust has only shut one of the seven wards earmarked for closure.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Investing in sufficient nurses to deliver high quality care, thus improving patient outcomes and reducing costs in the long run - there's a bizarre idea, but it might just work!

    Yes, tongue in cheek but isn't this what we in the front line have been saying for years as they cut our jobs, dilute the skill mix and overwork dedicated staff, with the obvious follow on of reduced ability to provide even basic standards of care??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.