Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Trusts will be able to breach spending cap on agency nurses

  • 6 Comments

NHS trusts will be allowed to breach a proposed cap on agency spending if they need to ensure wards are safely staffed, the regulator Monitor has said.

A consultation document was published yesterday on the proposed cap, which was announced by health secretary Jeremy Hunt in June.

Monitor has set out a list of possible exceptions trusts could use to justify going over the spending limit. These include:

  • where patient safety would be compromised without additional staff
  • where significant demand pressures above contracted activity put patient safety at risk
  • complying with Care Quality Commission warning notices on staffing
  • major service reconfigurations
  • special measures trusts with permanent recruitment difficulties
  • other trusts with problems recruiting permanent staff
  • trusts where trainees have been removed
  • where in-year service changes require an increase in staff, such as “double running” for new care models

The list of exceptions, which are also expected to apply to non-foundation trusts, could significantly weaken the effect of the proposed cap, which is being introduced to tackle the cost of temporary staff. In the last financial year this cost the provider sector £3.3bn.

One of the main causes of this spending has been the increased demand for qualified nurses on grounds of patient safety, following the Francis report and new safe staffing guidance for acute wards published by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.

As reported by Nursing Times last month, more than four-fifths of trusts were failing to meet their own plans for nurse staffing.

When a trust expects to breach the new rules it will need to report this to its board and to Monitor or the NHS Trust Development Authority, which would view it as a potential governance issue and could then investigate the organisation.

The Monitor document said: “For these rules to be effective, all trusts must keep to them. Patient and staff safety must be prioritised, but we expect over-riding the rules to be rare.

“There are some exceptional circumstances where the rules might be suspended or flexed,” it said. “To qualify, trusts will have to apply to the joint Monitor/TDA team and make a case that reasons outside the trust’s control justify an adjustment.”

It added: “The rules will not be adjusted to accommodate poor rota planning or poor planning of overall workforce requirements.”

In exceptional circumstances and at short notice, trusts will be able to over-ride the restrictions but will again have to report this to the board and regulators after the event and justify their reasoning.

A fixed maximum rate of pay for temporary nurses and their provider agency is expected to come into force next month, but the hourly rate as not been revealed.

“Patient and staff safety must be prioritised, but we expect over-riding the rules to be rare”

Monitor

In the consultation document, Monitor said it would propose a maximum hourly rate for agency nurses and publishing pay frameworks with agencies.

Trusts will not be allowed to use agencies not on frameworks unless they get approval from Monitor. They will only be able to act without approval “in response to an urgent, exceptional short term staffing requirement where patient safety would be compromised by failing to secure additional nursing staff”.

The document also revealed plans to set a cap on agency nurse spending for each trust, which would be based on a percentage of their overall nursing staff spending.

A common ceiling will be applied to most trusts, but the pace at which they will be expected to achieve it will depend on their current circumstances.

The document suggested an indicative rate of 3% for trusts where current spending on nurse staffing is less than 12%.

  • 6 Comments

Readers' comments (6)

  • Although expenditure on bank and agency staff requires appropriate action on the level of pay the fundamental issues still require acknowledgement. Undoubtedly, Francis has impacted on staffing levels but what is failing to be addressed or acknowledged is that not enough nurses are being trained due to fewer nurse training commissioned posts, the increased acuity and dependency of patients, the lack of community and social care investment coupled with staff who are under increasing levels of stress.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Couldn't have put it better myself

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • HCSW

    Buahaha! So even before the cap was introduced, there are already gateways planned.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Pussy

    That was predictable! Phew!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It was a sound idea to reduce dependence on agency nurses. My experience of them in a care home setting is that they will do as the owner says however harmful that is to the patient, then they get more work and the amoral owners get their profits by neglect and abuse to the vulnerable patients. The owners are so manipulative and charming to relatives and deceive them well. If the time spent on charming and deceiving went on actual patient care then there would not be the problem there is now.
    But some CCGs seem to insist on systemic abuse and neglect because they know sweet nothing about how to deliver lawful satisfactory care in a cost effective manner. So does this come from Whitehall?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Pussy

    Well anon that might be your experience but it most certainly isn't mine! I hope you reported these misdemeanours to the appropriate authorities.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.