Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

The Big Interview

'You have to invest in yourself. You cannot expect it to be handed to you'


Nurses should make the most of changes ahead, says Viv Bennett. Charlotte Santry meets the proud nurse tipped to be England’s chief nursing officer

Deputy chief nursing officer Viv Bennett is distinctly uncomfortable under the spotlight. “Why did you want to speak to me?” she asks suspiciously as I sit down in her Richmond House office, with its sliver of a view over the Thames.

However, over the coming year she will inevitably attract growing attention. Widely tipped to succeed Dame Christine Beasley as chief nursing officer for England, the qualified health visitor was also one of the first nurse commissioners, meaning she is well positioned to inform sweeping NHS reforms.

Her Department of Health portfolio includes community nursing and health visiting, commissioning, primary care, mental health, learning disabilities, and services for children and families.

I remind her of a comment piece she wrote for Nursing Times last year, in which she stated: “I was a commissioning nurse before they were invented”, and she smiles proudly. “What happened to me was very unusual,” she says.

While working as a community nurse manager in Oxfordshire in the early 1990s, she was approached about developing a new job that would reflect the new purchaser/provider split.

She ended up working in the role herself, looking at “the new world of purchasing and providing and what is it that nurses bring to the purchasing side”. Insights gleaned during this time made her a fierce proponent of nurse commissioning, which is unlikely to have gone unnoticed by the current administration.

“Well, who knows a lot about the needs of children and families? Health visitors do, they work with them all the time,” she states, hands slicing through the air. “Who has views about managing a population with long term conditions and keeping people out of hospital? Well, community matrons do.” Health secretary Andrew Lansley had better take note.

But her face flushes when I ask whether she believes nurses should be given a formal role on GP consortia boards. “I can’t really comment, I’m not allowed to comment,” she stammers, looking to the DH press officer to rescue her.

And she is non-committal when I ask whether she knows if nurses have been playing a big role in the pathfinder consortia announced the day of our interview: “It’s varied. They were only announced today… do you know what? I’ve been quite busy writing a health implementation plan.”

After rising to a senior role at Oxfordshire Health Authority, she became Birmingham Health Authority’s senior commissioning manager of children’s services.

This passion for families and children has provided a thread throughout her working life and, despite her obvious reservations about speaking to a journalist, she becomes incredibly animated.

“Sorry if I wave my hands about!” she apologises, as she explains how, as a student at Oxford School of Nursing in the late 1970s, she particularly enjoyed working with children and decided to work on a paediatric medical ward after qualifying, which she “loved”.

“We did a lot of work looking after children with epilepsy, doing lots of studies into epilepsy and children with cardiac problems, and it was great,” she says. This convinced her to focus on families and children, but she realised she “wanted to work with children who were well, as well as children who were sick”.

“So, I worked as a staff nurse, then did a little while on a paediatric intensive care [unit] part time and then I went to do my health visitor training, also in Oxford - Oxford Polytechnic.”

Her career has not been without plaudits: last year, she received the title of Queen’s Nurse at the Queen’s Nursing Institute’s spring award ceremony.

But achieving her goals involved some tough choices while her children, now adults, were young. Having not taken a nursing degree first time round, she gained a BA in social science with the Open University. She was later sponsored by the NHS to take a master’s degree in policy studies at the University of Bristol, which she accepts was a lucky break, but meant she “had to go away when the children were small”.

She fostered a disabled child for a short time, an experience that made her question why “we sometimes expect parents to do things that we’re nervous about getting healthcare assistants to do”. This formed her view that support staff can be trained to carry out a lot of the care given to children, despite the anxieties of many nurses about the “dilution” of skills.

Her attitude towards roles is typical of her lack of reverence towards fixed structures, demonstrated in her approach to transforming community services.

Under this policy, primary care provider arms will merge with acute trusts, mental health trusts or become community foundation trusts or social enterprises. Many community nurses are concerned about who their future employer will be and whether their terms and conditions will be retained.

But Ms Bennett is uninterested in “systems architecture”, which she says is “just stuff” to most patients. Referring to debates over whether health visitors should be aligned with GPs or based in Sure Start centres, she says: “I never like to get too tied down with that - where your office is isn’t the most important thing, you know.”

She is no policy geek, despite her role at the DH and postgraduate study. She appears neutral about current upheavals, repeatedly stressing the need to “make the most of” changes, good or bad, and citing “resilience” as the most important leadership quality.

Her real interest lies in ensuring services are working for patients, particularly families and children. “Start from the patient then work outwards to see what we need to do,” she advises. Which sounds exactly like the kind of manifesto you might expect from someone planning their move to the top of the nursing tree.

Dame Christine is due to retire in March but the future shape of the role is not yet set out. Some predict the position could be split, with one postholder in public health and the other on the NHS Commissioning Board.

Would she be interested in going for it? “It’s not something I ever aspired to do - it’s not that I went to this job thinking, ‘oh, yippee, the CNO’s about to retire and I can go for that’.

“I went for this job because it’s portfolio, it’s what I really wanted to do. So I suppose the honest answer is it will depend what the jobs are.”

She described her career as “reactive” but says she has always grabbed opportunities. “You have to be open to sideways moves as well as promotions. You have to be prepared to invest in yourself. I don’t think you can expect it to be handed to you.”

She would certainly appear to be a popular choice of candidate, judging by the observations of DH colleagues, one of whom said she was admired for her “incredible breadth of knowledge”. An ex-colleague put it another way: “She’d be a dame if she was in a hospital.”

Viv Bennett CV

Career highlights

● 1976-80: student nurse, John Radcliffe Hospital

● 1980-86: health visitor, Oxfordshire Community Unit

● 1992-96: quality development manager, senior nurse purchasing, public health practitioner,

Oxfordshire Health Authority

● 2002-06: director of nursing and patient services, South Warwickshire Primary Care Trust

● 2008-present: deputy chief nursing officer for England


Readers' comments (28)

  • "uncomfortable" and "non-committal" doesn't make her sound like a leader or voice for nursing. We need someone to stand and shout our cause.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree with halfanurse1987.. it sounds as though this lady is looking after her own ends.. and not really someone I would consider a voice of or for nursing!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Maybe this lady has been stitched-up by a journalist, but someone described as "distinctly uncomfortable under the spotlight" who says “Why did you want to speak to me?" ... "suspiciously"; while stammering “I can’t really comment, I’m not allowed to comment” "looking to the DH press officer to rescue her" ... doesn't come over as an articulate, strong-minded leader of the profession.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • agree with all above

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Absolutely agree with the above three comments. I hope I'm wrong, but doubt it. I mean, 'remaining neutral' about current upheavals? For crying out loud! Get a backbone! A huge proportion of Nurses are furious at the upheavals! A lot more are too dissilusioned, tired or fed up with the profession to be angry! Why isn't this woman as a proposed 'leader' reflecting that?

    Unfortunately many at the higher ranks of Nursing at the moment are no different. 'Dame' Christine clones out to serve their own needs, egos and wallets.

    We NEED a leader who will not simply smile and nod at every government decision or bend over at every policy aimed at shafting Nurses (such as the recent increment freeze!)

    We NEED a leader who will unashamedly go AGAINST prevailing cultures of the government and medical profession and DEMAND the status and respect our profession deserves. Instead of asking for a seat at the table of the new GP run NHS, our leader should be telling the GP's and the government in particular that if they want an NHS with us in it (they cannot have one without us) then we WILL be equal partners!

    We should have a leader who fights to get us fair pay! Or fights for a legalised Nurse/patient ratio! REAL initiatives that will improve our profession, our working lives and conditions, and patient safety, instead of the usual lip service to nonentity policy.

    But I guess we get the leadership we deserve as a profession. I'm off to Oz anyway where they have leadership and unions with real backbone. They also have a lot more pay, better training/working conditions and a 4 -6 patients per 1 staff Nurse ratio! Think about it people!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As a further point to my last comment, we NEED a VISIBLE leader, with the backbone to take us all out on strike to protest at the way our profession is being treated, and at the way patient safety is being routinely compromised by those in charge! We need this situation to change, and we need a leader to do it. From what I have read, I don't think she's it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mike,
    "I'm off to Oz anyway where they have leadership and unions with real backbone. They also have a lot more pay, better training/working conditions and a 4 -6 patients per 1 staff Nurse ratio"

    The following was taken from an Australian nursing forum, it doesn't sound that good to me.

    IronMaiden says:
    August 13, 2010 at 2:28 pm
    They forgot to mention verbal abuse and physical assault from patients and families. They forgot to mention the stress of working in such a highly regulated bureaucratic system that refuses to support its staff. The only way to cope is to try to get through your shift unscathed one day at a time and devote your time off to healthful and relaxing passtimes.

    In Australia, our corrupt and mismanaged Federal & State Health Dept.s think ALL Nurses must be stupid, and we can’t see what they are doing to Nurses in Public Health.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yet another ‘star turn’ being paid a fortune in a non-job. With this female at the helm, I’m sure 2011 will be a good year for nursing. Ha ha ha ha…

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • P Rogers

    Whilst I agree with some of the sentiments above it seems there’s a real lack of understanding about the Chief Nurse role.

    The chief nurse is a civil servant, a government employee whatever advice and opinions she offers on nursing is done behind closed doors, and Mike whilst we do need a visible leader whoever gets the job is never going to lead us all out on strike. If you want to strike go be a fireman.

    What is problematic about the CN role is that as well as helping to shape (not decide) government health policy, in support of the agenda set by the democratically elected government - a small but important consideration, she is also supposed to provide professional leadership to nursing and midwifery etc. These are two potentially conflicting functions, and where they do come into conflict it will always be the implementation of government policy that wins out. It sounds like a sell out and to some extent it is, it’s also why DH chief nurses are never radicals, they know their place and tow the line and in exchange at some point get a nice broach from the Queen. It also means we need to look elsewhere for professional leadership for nursing but that’s another debate…

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 12-Jan-2011 12:08 pm, I'm not saying they're perfect, but they are a lot better than what we have!

    P Rogers, I understand your point completely, and don't get me wrong I know what the CNO role is, especially as it relates to acting as a mouthpiece for government, but what I am saying is we should have a CNO who IS radical, who does put our profession first, who FORCES through policy. Can you imagine a Chief Medical Officer as subservient to the government as our CNO's are?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.