Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Fitness to practise proceedings launched following CQC inspections

  • 23 Comments

Fitness to practise investigations have been launched into nurses suspected of providing poor care during the Care Quality Commission’s recent dignity and nutrition inspections.

CQC inspection teams, including nurses, visited 200 wards where older people were cared for at 100 hospitals. The regulator found 20 hospitals were not compliant with one or both of the CQC’s “essential” standards on dignity and nutrition.

A final report on the inspections, published this week, identified common failings as ignored call bells, staff speaking to patients in a dismissive or condescending way, and patients going hungry because they were not helped to eat.

In a statement responding to the report, Nursing and Midwifery Council chief executive and registrar Dickon Weir-Hughes said: “We have opened fitness to practise investigations into a number of individuals whose practise may have fallen below the standards expected under their code.”

An NMC spokeswoman would not confirm how many nurses were being investigated by the regulator.

In particular, the CQC spot checks highlighted major concerns at James Paget University Hospitals Foundation Trust in Norfolk, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals and Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals Trust.

Worcestershire has since been found to be compliant with the CQC standards in a follow up inspection, but James Paget was issued with a warning notice after a return visit found care was still not meeting the required standards. Sandwell General Hospital has closed the ward where inspectors raised serious concerns about patient dignity.

CQC chair Dame Jo Williams said although inspectors often found big variations between different wards in the same trust, it was clear leadership in some places had allowed unacceptable care to become the “norm”.

Dame Jo said she recognised resources could play a part in the quality of care provided and urged management to make sure budgets were used “wisely”. But said the training of nurses should also be looked at to examine why care was “broken down into tasks to be completed – focusing on the unit of work, rather than the person who needs to be looked after”.

She added: “Care professionals need to strike the right balance between ensuring that people get the care they need in a safe way – recording how much they have eaten and drunk, what medications they have taken and when – while not prioritising processes over people.”

We have a NEW website just for student nurses, take a look now at www.studentnursingtimes.netand subscribe for just 70p a week.

  • 23 Comments

Readers' comments (23)

  • ROSEMARY CANTWELL | 19-Oct-2011 10:46 am

    Is that you, Michael Stone?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As has been pointed out on other threads, if anyone (e.g the media) actually look at the CQC report they'll see that in fact nurses don't get blamed for the problems that the researchers found.

    The issues that they uncovered were recognised as being management and organisational problems.

    They even went to the lengths of quoting patients who said the nurses were doing an excellent job but the wards were very short staffed.

    I suppose thhat doesn't make for interesting news though, and what would the dear old Daily Mail have to moan about then?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There's no excuse for abuse and neglect of vulnerable patients. The Code requires nurses to alert their managers about unsafe practice conditions. I'm sure many of them tried and were fobbed off or threatened in response, because that's what happened to me.

    I bet this Fitness for Practice action doesn't include a single nurse manager or Director of Nursing! They're Teflon coated when it comes to professional accountability and just go on to abuse more staff and patients in future.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.