Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Practice comment

'It’s time we adopted a laissez–faire approach to health promotion'


A practice nurse has ten minutes in which to walk a tightrope between managing a patient’s agenda and imparting lifestyle advice.

Health promotion is arguably like a trapeze which has swung so far in favour of lifestyle issues that we are at risk of alienating a sizeable proportion of the general public who believe the NHS is a safety net which will catch them regardless of how many cigarettes they smoke or how sedentary they are.

I have a friend who dedicates her time to her local community. She is a wonderful mother who is both capable and smart. Above all, she is kind, caring and hospitable. But the thought of making an appointment with her practice nurse or GP fills her with dread, because she just “knows” she would be “told off” about her weight and reduced to a quivering state of jelly (sugar- free),  with tears (reduced salt), welling in her humiliated eyes. This is a prime example of a nurse-patient relationship that is already beyond repair even though it has not yet even taken place. I do not believe this is untypical.

So, when exactly did we become the health police? I’ve lost count of the initiatives, directives, consultation documents, white papers, green papers, assessments of local health needs created by a nanny state approach to healthcare. These days we’re expected to “nudge” people into adopting healthy lifestyles, which I suppose is a more genteel way of trying to get patients to bend to our will. And when nudging doesn’t work, as it almost certainly won’t, what happens then? Another consultation document to mull over?

Of course, there are many models and theories which underpin health promotion, and I suspect we all have our preferred frameworks on which to base our care. Perhaps the time has come to turn health promotion on its head, offer brief health information,   but otherwise adopt a laissez–faire approach with the general public, and just see what happens. The result may prove surprising - with targeted planning by local authorities and voluntary groups, people may become responsible for their own well-being.

One thing is for certain - I have never met anyone yet who looks even mildly surprised when they are told that cigarette smoking can be harmful, but we persist in repeating this message in a scary/ yucky/ heart rending /humorous/ colourful/ funereal (delete where applicable ) way. Whenever patients come to see me about lifestyle change they are often expecting to fail. I can work with that, and so can many other practice nurses who are adept at utilising patient-centred health promotional techniques.

The days of believing that a “good” patient is one who engages in lifestyle change needs to be numbered. However, if a patient presents with tonsillitis, ingrowing toenails or blocked ears, should nurses really be expected to encroach into their ten minutes of appointment time to reach for the scales, ask about units of alcohol consumed weekly, or wrap a tape measure between his lower ribs and iliac crest? 

Jane Warner is locum practice nurse in Somerset; and associate lecturer, General Practice Nursing Foundation Programme, University of Plymouth


Readers' comments (2)

  • The role of healthcare professionals is to offer evidence based information (not advice or coercion) in an impartial manner and in terms dependent on the assessed level of pt understanding, to non-judgementally respect choices made by the pt and to signpost or personally offer support if required by the pt. Realistically health promotional advice within the limitation of a 10 min time slot should be focused on the presenting complasint, unless other requests for info are initiated by the pt. It would be unethical to raise issues for which support cannot then be offered in such cases.What about setting up informal drop-in sessions for public health promotion information, or perhaps not as this activity would probably not be financed by the PCT and again realistically practice nurses and others are directed to focus on identified issues which are financially compensatable.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am rarely shocked by anything I read in a Journal but this piece by Jane Warner is disturbing and almost offensive in its complacency.

    As nurses we have a duty of care to acccept that ill health is a bad thing and that health is a good thing. Smoking - like playing in busy traffic - kills people and causes anguish and suffering. The risks of obesity are also well documented.

    That an experienced nurse should question the ethics of daring to advise patients about how to prevent ill health and further suggests that people should simply be left to "get on with it" for fear of "bending them to our will" or infringing their rights is as perverse as it is shocking.

    Perhaps Ms Warner should really be considering a career other than a nurse

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.