Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

SHAs raid £100m from staff training budget

  • 1 Comment

More than 100m earmarked for the training of healthcare professionals in England - at least a quarter of which was allocated for nurse training - has not been spent on this vital area, figures reveal

Click here for a PDF of this article, including a map detailing underspend by each SHA

Some strategic health authorities have skimmed more than£70m from education and training budgets for 2007-2008, while others have left a total of around£30m in training
budgets unspent.

Freedom of Information Act requests by NT identified four SHAs that have raided budgets initially intended for training by the government.

South Central, East Midlands, South East Coast and East of England SHAs have cumulatively diverted almost£75m away from their original Multi-Professional Education and Training (MPET) budget allocations, provided by the Department of Health for the last financial year (see table).

Moreover, six of the 10 SHAs have declared a final MPET underspend of£28.8m (see map).

However, not all of the SHAs have reported their data. Neither NHS London nor NHS West Midlands would reveal their figures, citing technicalities.

NHS London previously forecasted an MPET underspend of£49m, meaning the overall amount of money taken from nurse training could be far higher than£100m, while NHS West Midlands has refused to divulge any figures.

However, budget figures given to NT by the DH reveal further discrepancies. The government said it gave two SHAs a total of almost£12m more than they claimed in their FOI responses.

So the final MPET which was allocated by government for 2007-2008 but did not reach the frontline could eventually surpass£164m.

Betty Kershaw, RCN acting education adviser, said: ‘We should be seriously concerned.’

For example, she said, training would be needed to comply with the government’s plans to move large areas of NHS service provision from acute care into the community, as well as warning that the funding cuts could result in the loss of nurse tutors for future generations of students.

‘They will affect the ability of the universities to respond to continuing professional development in respect not only to community services but also to pre-registration,’ she said.

‘Universities are going to be the ones who have to meet the demands being brought about by the ageing workforce we have now,’ she added.

NT’s investigation shows that SHAs have not learnt their lesson from previous years. Between the financial years 2005 and 2007 SHAs diverted almost£500m from staff education and training.

The government refused to ringfence the budgets but instead put in place a service level agreement (SLA) with SHAs, which states that they must spend the money to meet
local needs.

Paul Turner, executive officer, Council of Deans for Health, said: ‘We will continue to have conversations with the Department of Health around the way they implement the service level agreement and will continue to be concerned if money allocated is not used in that area.

‘We would hope the DH would take a strong view with the SHAs that have not spent all of their allocation for education purposes,’ he added.

Junior health minister Lord Darzi told parliament last month that the DH was not planning to ensure underspent funds from this year were put back into training for 2008-2009 (NT News, 20 May, p5).

However, NT has been told by the DH that it is currently reviewing the performance of the SHAs against the SLA for 2007-2008 and is also considering toughening up the agreement for next year.

Funds diverted by SHAs (in£millions)

SHADH Allocation 07/08Topsliced budget 07/08Difference
South Central29227220
East Midlands33632214
South East Coast2382308
East of England33330132
Total  74


  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Students like myself are finding it difficult financially to live on what has been given to us for a bursary and to survive on £620 for the month. The work load and time does not permit us to work and have enough time to spend on studying and passing our exams and placements. Maybe they could look into the idea of using the surplus money that they have to left to help students more, less stress and better quality nursing.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs