Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

MPs show support for NT campaign on nurse commissioning

  • 1 Comment

An influential group of MPs are planning to investigate whether GP commissioning consortia should have to have nurses on their board.

The Commons health committee last week said it would review “arrangements for integrating the full range of clinical expertise into the commissioning process” under the government’s proposed reform in coming months.

There is concern nurses and other clinicians will not have enough influence over the GP commissioners and Nursing Times is campaigning for consortia to appoint nurses to their board.

The health committee, in a report into the health reforms, said: “We believe it is essential for clinical engagement in commissioning to draw from as wide a pool of practitioners as is possible in order to ensure that it delivers maximum benefits to patients.

“[GPs] should be seen as generalists who draw on specialist knowledge when required, not as the ultimate arbiters of all commissioning decisions.”

The report says nurses make a “significant contribution” in primary care and “are increasingly responsible for ‘micro’ commissioning decisions such as referral for investigations”.

It continues: “Greater nurse and other professional involvement in commissioning would be a logical extension of the intention [to link] the budgets for secondary care with those who make the referrals.”

The report stops short of saying consortia should be required to have nurse members but says the committee with investigate further.

Sarah Wollaston, a member of the committee and a GP, said: “It would be unthinkable for GP commissioners not to consult colleagues. The question is whether they are mandated to have someone on the board, or mandated to seek advice [from other clinicians].”

Sign Nursing Times’ petition of Andrew Lansley for increased nurse involvement in GP commissioning here.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • First of all it is about damn time someone took this seriously, although I fear an 'investigation' will not go far enough.

    Second of all I cannot believe the sheer patronising nature of this whole debate. Should Nurses be 'allowed' onto boards? Should consortia 'have' to have us on there?

    We make FAR more than a significant contribution to primary care, and there would not be secondary care without us!

    Despite this, I agree with this article wholeheartedly. GP's, as important as they are to the health care system, are NOT the sole arbiters of all health care, they are a tiny proportion of an overall system. This new clinician led NHS (which in theory CAN be a good thing if done right, which it isn't now) MUST be made up of Doctors AND Nurses, it must include input from specialists from ALL areas, Pharmacists,mental health, etc. No one is more important than anyone else in this sense, we all have important input into decisions that will affect patient care.

    Whilst it is right that Clinicians must lead the NHS, it is not right to give overall control to a small minority of clinicians.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.