Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

New training body may be powerless to stop funds being siphoned


The body being handed £5bn of training funding may lack the “authority” to ensure the money is protected, the Royal College of Nursing has warned.

The union’s fears about planned changes to NHS education structures are set out in a report submitted to the NHS Future Forum.

The forum is following the report it published in June with a second set of recommendations to the government focusing on four areas, including education and training.

Under government plans, instead of strategic health authorities paying for training, groups of trusts will form local education and training boards (LETBs) to pool education funds and decide how they are spent.

Health Education England will distribute around £5bn of training money to the LETBs and hold them to account for how they spent it.

But the RCN’s submission to the Future Forum says “it is not clear whether HEE will have the authority” to hold LETBs to account.

The government has said it wants to “protect” training funds but this may fall short of introducing ringfenced budgets.

HEE’s newly appointed senior responsible officer Chris Outram – who formerly led MEE – told Nursing Times she will make it “absolutely clear” to trusts that the funds must not be raided.

HEE will hold LETBs to account through an outcomes framework being developed.

However, HEE would not have the power to simply withhold money from large networks that were not complying with the rules, Ms Outram added.

The RCN is also worried that “HEE as currently conceived is likely to be dominated by medical deaneries”. The body was formed out of three advisory bodies, the largest being Medical Education England (MEE).

Nursing Times understands this concern was raised at a consultation event last week with Future Forum member Julie Moore, chief executive of University Hospitals Birmingham Foundation Trust.

But Ms Outram said: “We’re really not taking MEE and just adding a few other people. The nursing profession is large and very important.”


Readers' comments (4)

  • Sigh.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The funds will be raided by Trusts all right, just as they did with the money that was once set aside for patient's comfort, at one time. Isn't that stealing??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "The nursing profession is large and very important.”

    Indeed it is Ms Outram. The truth is that you have no idea just how important...............but soon you will.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • michael stone

    This isn't an area I know much about.

    But, money aside, wouldn't it be a start, if there was a certain amount of time set aside (and in some way enforced) which employers (ie a hospital, care home, etc) had to use solely for improving the skills and training of staff ? So, perhaps for nurses that might be a 2 hour period per fortnight (or whatever - this is a concept).

    If there was some reserved time which must be used for training, irrespective of monetary considerations, at least there would be a 'framework' within which any available money might (but need not necessarily - you could still have off-site training, or whatever) be spent. And if the training time was unavoidable, managers would de facto provide some sort of training to fill it, or else they know they would get criticised.

    Just a thought.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.