Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Study pilots ‘paying’ new mums to breastfeed


New mothers are to be paid to breastfeed their babies as part of a research project examining whether or not uptake rates will increase if they are offered financial incentives.

Vouchers for Matalan, John Lewis or Mothercare - as well as supermarkets - will be dished out to new mothers if they feed their babies with breast milk.

Researchers from the University of Sheffield are examining ways to boost the low rates of breastfeeding.

Despite numerous attempts to encourage new mothers to breastfeed their babies, rates remain stubbornly low in parts of the UK.

The new study is to be trialled in Derbyshire and South Yorkshire - in areas where breastfeeding uptake rates are low.

Mothers will be given shopping vouchers worth up to £120 if their babies receive breast milk until they are six week old, and a further £80 if their babies continue to be breastfed until they are six months.

If the “feasibility” project is successful, the authors will conduct a national research project into the scheme.

The NHS recommends that mothers exclusively breastfeed their babies during the first six months. Despite this, only 34% of UK babies are breastfed at six months, with only 1% exclusively breastfed at this stage said principle investigator Dr Clare Relton.

The senior research fellow at the University of Sheffield said breastfeeding is “stigmatised” in parts of the UK - for example, some advertising for formula milk sends out subliminal negative messages about breastfeeding which contributes to low uptake rates, she said.

“The UK has one of the worst breastfeeding rates in the world and breastfeeding rates vary very widely across different parts of the country,” said Dr Relton.

“If you are a six-week-old baby the chances of you being breastfed vary depending on where you live. If you live in an affluent area you are four times more likely to be breastfed than if you live in a deprived area.

“Babies who are breastfed have fewer health problems such as upset tummies and chest infections, and are less likely to develop diabetes and obesity when they are older. Breast milk is perfectly designed for babies and provides all they need for the first six months of their life.

“The scheme offers vouchers to mothers who breastfeed as a way of acknowledging both the value of breastfeeding to babies, mothers and society, and the effort involved in breastfeeding.

“Offering financial incentives for mothers to breastfeed might increase the numbers of babies being breastfed, and complement on-going support for breastfeeding provided by the NHS, local authorities and charities.”

The preliminary study will focus on up to 130 mothers who give birth between November and March.

If the mothers breastfeed their children for a full six months they will receive £200 shopping vouchers - half for supermarkets and half for high street stores.

The vouchers, which are being funded by the National Prevention Research Initiative, will be dished out in five stages of £40 each.

The initiative will not be rigorously policed and will simply require the participating mother and their health visitor or midwife to sign off to say they are breastfeeding.

Dr Relton said the test will not only ascertain whether or not the payment improves uptake rates, they will look at whether women think they are being “bribed or rewarded” after they receive the vouchers.

“We’re testing whether this is a way of increasing the perceived value of breastfeeding.”

Janet Fyle, professional policy advisor at the Royal College of Midwives, said: “Whilst we are not against financial incentives for the right reasons, there is a much bigger social and cultural problem here that needs to be tackled instead of offering financial incentives for mothers to breastfeed.

“In many areas, including those in this study, there are generations of women who may not have seen anyone breastfeeding their baby, meaning it is not the cultural norm in many communities.

“The motive for breastfeeding cannot be rooted by offering financial reward. It has to be something that a mother wants to do in the interest of the health and well-being of her child.

“Investing in midwives and improving ante-natal and post-natal care will go a long way to reversing the worryingly low levels of breastfeeding that we are seeing in certain communities.”


Are you able to Speak out Safely?

Sign our petition to put pressure on your trust to support an open and transparent NHS


Readers' comments (16)

  • What a waste of money! And how patronising too. So the idea is "you are too stupid or stubborn to do as we tell you with your breasts but we bet you will do it for money!"


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Ellen Watters

    I agree Sarah, why not employ more nurses to support the new mums instead, or is that too simple.. I'd have loved to have had a dedicated breast feeding support nurse when I was a new mum.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • That seems to be the way Gov does it-throw money where it isn't appropriate and take it from where it is needed, just liike Labour Party would. If a mum cant be persuaded that its right for baby and would save her time and money, then financial bribery wont either. She'll take the money, try to feed for a day or two and then onto the bottle

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Does the rest of the world bribe mothers to breastfeed, what a waste of money!
    Perhaps investing in a few more community support staff would help.
    Long term this could only be financed by the POOR long suffering tax payer - never, never never!!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • From what I have read here, this is a feasibility study. So the conclusion may be that the offering of financial incentives to increase the amount of mums who breast feed isn't feasible, and no further studies will be carried out. We know from previous studies into incentives in other areas (eg smoking cessation) that engagement is improved and, that as an adjunct to improved support, outcomes are better. There is no suggestion that, "the motive for breastfeeding....." should " rooted by offering financial reward.", or that financial incentives should replace improvements in ante-natal and post-natal care.

    The use of incentives in any healthcare setting always induces apoplexy and outrage. I wonder how many have read the background and methodolgy of this feasibility study and/or any other published work on the use of incentives and the results.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • why all the shock and horror? midwives need to look at their own practices. this country has among the lowest breastfeeding rates worldwide. that is disgraceful and it isn't to do with lack of resources or staff. a small input now to save much later on in healthier individuals who have benefitted from breast feeding.
    stop leaving babies in cupboards and open your minds!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What a total waste of money. New mums either want to breastfeed or they don't, it should be a personal choice untainted by money. And why should resources be taken out of struggling NHS coffers to support such a stupid idea. If there is money available they pay your staff what they worth. Talk about rubbing salt in wounds!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Stupid stupid waste of money!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Use the money to invest in staff? Did you read the article? £200 given out in £40 lots, I.e. 5 times. To 1300 women. Which is £2600 in total. A tenth of a qualified nurse. This isn't about politics, this is the same old faffing about with tiny amounts of money on small scale projects to see if something will work, like when they gave ipod prizes to teenagers to try and improve chlamydia screening rates. It either fails or works but fizzles out because it's so small and funds non recurrent. Give the £2600 to the midwifery staff and ask them how best to spend it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So no one has read the background or rationale for this study? Result. Ignorant comments comprising mostly of mock outrage. One doesn't need to look far to understand why so few nurses lead any research.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 1020results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs