Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

The debate around public service cuts lacks logic

  • 1 Comment

So, I’m driving to work, near the coast but not so near that the roads were not surrounded by fields and trees. Lovely day, beautiful light and the mistake I made was having the radio on as it threatened to “debate” cuts to public services.

Of course, I try to avoid such things. I didn’t want to spend the rest of the journey shouting at the radio. I hate talking to electrical appliances. Except the fridge. The fridge understands me. But I thought - with all the naivety of a lamb booking into the Slaughterhouse Hotel - that maybe someone would say something unexpected, something new.

Thirteen seconds later I turned it off. Some annoying buffoon was saying “Public services have had it too easy for too long - they arrogantly presume they are different from the rest of us but they are not”. He worked for a tabloid newspaper - you nurse. He writes drivel for a living - you look after ill people. Are those things not different? Who kidnapped reason and replaced it with a talking doughnut?

Obviously, logic has nothing to do with the discussion around public service cuts. Everyone I know, be they nurses, doctors or teachers, realises that the work they do and the reason they do it is going to be undermined - if not devastated - over the next couple of years.

‘Let’s stop this expensive public service nonsense and do something useful, like sell carpets to the people of Britain. Think of the money it would save’

The mantra is set: we have to claw back an awful lot of the money we spent on banks, wars, economic speculation and unnecessary shoes. We can’t do that with taxes because people will get cross so we’d best stop investing so much in all the peripheral stuff like healthcare, education or those blokes in shiny hats who put out fires.

And, maybe rather than argue with the festival of wrongness that is modern politics, we should make it easier for the “economy” and just stop doing what we do - yes, all of us - and go and open a chain of carpet shops. Let’s stop this public service nonsense which is annoying and expensive and instead do something useful with our time. Provide floor covering for the people of Britain and turn a healthy profit too. Think of the money it would save.

Then we could sell off the schools and hospitals and use the space they so annoyingly take up to build extra car parks or shopping malls which will, of course, create jobs for countless former radiographers, occupational therapists and neurosurgeons.

Of course, if people still carried on getting ill we might have one or two problems, but I’m almost sure someone will come up with something, particularly when retailers and businessmen are so much happier with the economy and they can think again of how to pay for those little extras like a police force or some pesky midwives.

Petulant? Probably - but the nature of the public service debate invites it. If the premise is that public services have the same moral and social value as selling houses, playing football or baking cakes than the premise is wrong and we ought to spend some time establishing a better one. The fact that we won’t makes us all poorer and will cost so much more than money in the long term.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Right On!!!
    Seem that the long term effects of the 'Peter Principal' is showing - "that employees within an organization will advance to their highest level of competence and then be promoted to and remain at a level at which they are incompetent." - and is alive (after 10+ years) and causing havoc in government, health care and so many areas where decisions and plans cause the first response to be, "What???"
    After 20 or so years, I agree, the carpet trade looks good.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs