Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

University dropped from NHS London course provider list


A major shake-up of nurse education in London has resulted in the University of West London being dropped from a list of the capital’s training providers.

NHS London announced last week that eight universities would be allowed to bid for funding to provide adult nursing education in future, down from the current nine.

The strategic health authority, which is England’s biggest funder of adult nurse training, announced plans last year to cut the number studying adult nursing each year from 2,000 to 1,580.

Nursing Times revealed it also intended to review whether all the universities should continue to provide adult course places for the capital’s student nurses due to an expected cut in training budgets and concerns from the nursing profession about quality.

The University of West London’s college of nursing and midwifery currently teaches pre-registration nursing courses from sites in Brentford and Reading. It will still provide adult nursing courses in Reading, plus other nursing courses including child and mental health nursing from both sites.

A university spokeswoman said students who had started their adult nursing courses in Brentford would be allowed to complete them.

NHS London’s most recent rankings of the nine universities, which assessed performance in 2009-10, put the University of West London in eighth place, above the University of Hertfordshire.

A spokesman for NHS London said: “The bid from the University of West London was successful in meeting the quality standards set by NHS London. However, it did not achieve preferred bidder status when compared to other bidders received and due to the overall reduction in adult nursing commissions.”

Announcing the list of eight course providers last week, NHS London director of people and organisational development Anne Rainsberry said: “If we continue to train the same number of adult nurses as we currently do, there will soon be more trained nurses than there are jobs available.”



Readers' comments (5)

  • The standard of teaching at UWL is poor. ALL courses should be given to better providers. It is a patient safety issue...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous 11.44am; that is generalisation and if i read the article well it says they were 8th best. Were you a student there to know the teaching is poor? Moreover, UWL offers other courses not just adult nursing.

    Last year, King's College University did not even made the first 10 in London and their bidding still went through. This is talking about how good you are in bidding and pleading your case, which they were unable to do. Although, they met the quality standard set by NHS London but just not good enough in their bidding.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sounds to me that this 'bidder' not cheap enough compared to other providers. Of course, the quality might be poor as well but I suspect some of the cheaper options could be just as poor in quality but CHEAP crap is more acceptable than expensive crap!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We have King's College Students on our ward and they are excellent and a lot brighter, knowledgeable and intuitive than the other students from other uni's we also have.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Having worked in the south east i had the opportunity to mentor students both in the community setting(for adult cohort) and acute setting( student midwives on a postnatal ward) i can honestly agree with Anonymous | 23-Jan-2012 11:44 am. The teaching a UWL is poor and the only ones that suffer are the students. I have been told that was one of major drivers in why they changed their name.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.