Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Ward duties put specialist nurse roles at risk

  • 20 Comments

Trusts that send clinical nurse specialists back to the wards could be putting the future of the clinical nurse specialist role at risk, Nursing Times had been told.

Last week an investigation by Nursing Times revealed hospital trusts across England were requiring clinical nurse specialists to undertake general ward duties outside of their specialist role.

A similar pattern is emerging in Scotland, where NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde now requires clinical nurse specialists to work one day a week on acute wards.

The move has sparked concern from nurse union leaders, who say it creates “real issues” about the role of the clinical nurse specialist and nurses’ career prospects.

Royal College of Nursing head of policy development and implementation Howard Catton said trusts need to be clear about their rationale for asking nurse specialists to undertake general ward duties.

“My concern is whether this is being driven by the need for efficiency savings and workforce flexibility, or whether it is being driven by patient need and clinical demand,” he said.

“There is a concern that nurses may not be as attracted to specialist nursing roles in the future if there is the impression that when times get tough they will be asked to step back from these roles,” he said.

Unison head of nursing Gail Adams said it was “highly appropriate and highly relevant” that clinical nurse specialists undertook ward duties if the purpose was to maintain clinical skills and help pass on knowledge to others.

But she said using nurse specialists as an “additional pair of hands” was unacceptable and could lead to the role being undermined.

“We will lose their clinical expertise because their [specialist] knowledge will become more distant,” she told Nursing Times.

“In addition to this, they will become frustrated that they are not being given the authority or ability to do the job they have been trained to do and they may vote with their feet,” she said.

The cost effectiveness of clinical nurse specialists is coming under increasing scrutiny, with many trusts looking closely at the roles in response to budget pressures.

Independent nurse consultant in rheumatology Sue Oliver told Nursing Times it was vital clinical nurse specialists kept accurate and up to date records of their work so they could prove their worth to directors of nursing and commissioners.

  • 20 Comments

Readers' comments (20)

  • I work in a mental health trust...lets really be honest like most other things in nursing it is all dependent on how focused the person is on patient care to how good they are as a specialist nurse.........if we take mental healthcare for example a CNS will take a smaller caseload than a functional CPN, have clients that are unique case studies and high probability of recovery....the rest is left to the nurses they cant help have a "dig at" for not doing things from their point of view.
    CNS spend much of their time in meetings, doing admin and presenting what other nurses are doing to third parties and not so often using direct patient contact as a way of filling their contracted hours.
    Like lots of posts in nursing it seems that these sorts of positions exsist to reward nurses for their hard slog on wards, and when analysed it dosent have much use as they are not there to help staff reach new levels of practice and be knowledgeable of best practice (although they should be) but just to critique the contribution other people make.
    There will be people replying with lots of justifications of these posts and say we do this, we do that etc...but I dont care, from my perspective its just another layer of management sitting in their ivory tower that think hands on ward work is somehow beneath them now they ve "made it".
    fair play that they have to get back to basics and rediscover what patients need.
    Theres a beautiful model of nuirsing that barker describes of asking identifying with the patient, asking them what they want and lastly doing it..does that make me a CNS for doing no more than that?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Problem with the persons not the role - the the money often comes from a separate source of funding.... Let's apoint a CNS or two with the cash we got. There is no CNS factory producing CNS of verifyable quality. Some are truly excellent, others not so. NMC light years behind the wave have done nothing to ensure the quality either.

    BUT please don't equate patient contact time as the ultimate measure of a professionals value. It's idiotic.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • idiotic? is nursing about looking after people...its idiotic to suggest nursing is contact and your obviously one of them

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | 11-May-2010 8:33 pm.

    CNS the clue is in the title. Guess it would mean spending some time educating other nurses maybe some medical staff, improving standards of care, writing protocols, liasing with other professionals at a strategic level. Not all best measured by patient contact time as an indicator of value you think?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • rovergirl6@hotmail.com

    my feeling on this situation is that the clinical nurse specialist will have the ability to observe the wards to ensure that the care of the patients is at its most efficient,it will also give them the opportunity of having one day a week when they can wind down a little from the very their very demanding role and perform the duties of a ward nurse. If i were in their shoes i would grab this opportunity with both hands .assuming of course they are not expected to day a drop in pay for that one day. let us not forget we are nurses who care but we all have mortgages and lives to pay for.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well, well, well....it's getting interesting. Finances and bottom line, those are the most driving forces in all healthcare. I never understand why nurses think any different. Specialist nurses often find it difficult to measure outcomes, and so it will be hard to justify the higher salary when wards or depts are struggling.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think this is a great idea - there has been much de-skilling of nursing staff over the years. At one time nurses had to deal with whatever arose on the ward and knew what to do without having to call on someone who is a 'specialist'. From what I can see there has been too much fragmentation of the job and this might help to put it back together again along with some continuity of care with patients knowing who is looking after them.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • the situation is not any different from what is happening in Ghana. specialist nurses are being sent back to the ward to play the role of general nurses and the rationale sometimes is shortage of staff. come to talk of salary increment, the salary remains the same in exception of nurse anaesthesiologist and a medical assistant. it's terrible.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Oh dear, again nurses are at each others throats again. This is not about CNS's verses Ward Nurses and who provides the best care. BOTH provide care and BOTH complement each other. NEITHER can function without the other. CNS's are required to provide specialista dvice and knowledge that is not available on the wards, to manage caseloads that would swamp wards, prevent admissions, reduce admisions, enhance patient care, educate ward staff and take some of the pressure of the wards. CNS's are often in meetings, redefining healthboard strategies, working on care plans and coordinating patient care.

    As a CNS I have a caseload of over 600 patients - each of these requires different skils, and odten as a CNS i am the patients point of contact for advice, support and problem solving. When on a ward could a patient phone up for advice and spend thirty or forty minutes speaking with a dedicated professional. As a CNS i coordinate admissions, arrange discharges and prevent / reduce readmissions to hospital. Thois could not be done within a ward environment.

    And WHO will pick up the patients and jobs that are not done for that day the CNS's are on the wards!

    Contrary to the management viewpoint - putting CNS's back to the ward will not Reduce admissions, enhance care, reduce costs and enhance education. Rather it will increase readmissions, increase costs, reduce care and detract from education to ward staff.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is a very very interesting little debate ongoing here! I think what it really shows is a total lack of understanding in the main part of the clinical nurse specialist role. I am a nurse consultant in Tissue Viability and my role begins and ends very much at a ward level, 50% of my time is clinical and I have to fight quite hard to maintain that. The strategic element of the role cannot be undervalued - would we have the equipment to care for our patients without that part of the role? I think not. I already work alongside nurses at ward level the aim being to upskill, but I am not a pair of hands - I am there to physically care for patients with the nurses and help them in terms of providing expertise and education but also increasingly helping nurses prioritise patient care. I champion the fundamentals of care and I appear to be having an increasing role in expediting patient discharge from hospital. We are in a changing and challanging healthcare climate we need to be together and not against each other, equally nurse specialism in this country needs to step up and show its worth, the system Pandora should be FREELY AVAILABLE this IT system clearly demonstrates the value of nurse specialism. Are we asking our medical colleagues to act as F2's - now there is a real debate and a potential cost efficiency!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 1020results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs